Category Archives: COMMENTARY

SPECIAL MASTER

SPECIAL MASTER

SPECIAL MASTER


— Read on annarinowrites.wordpress.com/2022/09/02/special-master/

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY, POLITICS

SPECIAL MASTER

Photo by CQF-Avocat on Pexels.com

I cannot write carelessly about the Law. I am a retired attorney-at-law, former State Assistant Attorney General and former Associate Director of Legal Affairs for a university. I love the law with a passion. I am dedicated to the protection it affords individuals, my state, my country, my world.

The Declaration of Independence and Constitution of the United States are foremost in our minds when speaking of the treasure which is our Democratic republic. Brave documents written by men who had had enough of autocratic rule by a king out of touch with his subjects’ concerns an ocean away. Self-rule advanced eons by the declaration and constitutional reign of this nation of laws and not men. But, this new form of governance was at terrible risk of failure as it sought to establish itself among the colonists in the many states of the new nation. In 1789 George Washington signed into law the firs act of the new congress, the Judiciaries Act. The Judiciaries Act  established a three-part judiciary made up of district, courts, circuit courts and the Supreme Court, out-lining the duties of each branch. It also defined the role of Attorney General and the Dept. of Justice. It has been amended over the years, but never up-ended. The rights of appeal and the ultimate supremacy of the highest court to assure the constitution and the principles of the newly established republic were upheld in every state of the new union. Cases decided under this new system cemented the Rule of Law as the authority over its citizens. We have no king. We have no prince. We have political parties; but they have been given no authority to rule us. Let me repeat. Political parties have no legal authority over a free people. Only the law does so.

There have always been citizens seeking a king, or a party to undermine the Rule of Law. This is not new. What is new is a party which would be king. What is new are judges on our courts willing to acknowledge that party as king. 

A judge by definition must be an independent arbiter, looking to the American law and its principles to guide her decisions. No judge should EVER comment before all parties to a lawsuit have even filed their briefs; nor that she in “inclined” to decide in favor of a party to the suit. No judge should ever place party interest above the rule of law, its principles, and the security of the nation she serves.

Judges, like all public servants, serve the people.

There is a principle at work in legal ethics supported by courts to protect an individual’s conversation with his attorney regarding a legal issue. There is a principle at work supported by courts to not reveal through the normal exercise of court transparency those secrets of the nation which, if exposed, could cause irreparable harm to the very nation and its people’s national security. There is a principle at work supported by courts to protect witnesses and keep them safe.

In this case, an about to be charged criminal who stole the most desperately protected top secret documents, and it appears those likely including nuclear weapons secrets, hid that evidence of his crime amidst personal papers. Thus, we the people represented by the Department of Justice and FBI are faced with trying to sort the evidence of the crime for two reasons: to successfully prosecute a treasonous ex-president, and to protect our own national security and those who act on our behalf to do so every day.

Let me be clear, this case should have been disposed of by summary judgement the first day it was filed by the ex-president. He should have been re-directed to the court which handled the case from its inception, and this argument reviewed by the judge who already was handling the search and its legal issues. Or, it should have been dismissed since he had no standing to contest anything since the papers were seized as evidence of a crime. Not just any crime. A crime that endangers an entire nation, and other nations within our alliance. His criminal act of hiding documents should not then be used to further his and others’ crime. The delays caused the moment this judge accepted, and now continues to delay the efforts to unravel the crime and shut-down the threat to each of these nations, furthers the crime. A Special Master appointment furthers the crime. Justice delayed is Justice denied. The people of this nation deserve justice.

My guess is that the attorney-client communication at issue likely is more evidence of criminal activity affecting the survival of the country, which the attorneys should have reported, not argue should be protected. We are putting the interest of a single criminal over the interest of the continuing existence of the United states of America, and the republics around the world who strive to be equally free of kings, princes, autocrats and thug parties.

Individual interests are sacrosanct within our courts. This situation reminds me of the philosophical question about three people in a life boat with only enough food for one to survive delayed rescue. Who is sacrificed as the danger continues and prompt rescue is unlikely? Do we sacrifice one to save more? Who could decide such case? Judges face difficult situations every day. Solomons are not that rare. I once had a case where the divorcing parties last remaining dispute was who got the parrot. The Judge ordered the parrot split in half unless an agreement was reached in 10 minutes. Opposing counsel and I were thrilled to carry that message since nothing we said had moved either party over months of discussion. 

Judges must be decisive. It is implied by their title, right? “Under consideration” is a dodge where the legal issues are is clear as they are here. This judge seems to be looking for  a way to satisfy the party which holds her future appointments in their hands. Or, perhaps she was just not so qualified as she needed to be to decide cases at this level, or perhaps she has the nation’s interest at heart. But, if so, is she blind to the cost to the nation by her non-decisive action? Is she struggling to find some way, any way, to defend and support her “inclinations”?

The Rule of Law, the Judiciaries Act, are the cement holding together the foundation of any democratic republic. Our foundation is crumbling before our eyes, Silence is not an option.

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY, POLITICS

THE LONG HAUL

Photo by cottonbro on Pexels.com

Poetry saved me once thirty years ago when CFS laid me low. So low, I could no longer stand, sit up, kneel, walk nor talk. In fact, speech made no sense to me. When others spoke I heard noise, not language. Exhaustion over took every cell and the energy needed to operate cell function. It was an “all systems fail” experience that lasted for decades. Speech slowly returned after several months, as bits and pieces dropped from my lips, grammar-less and word substitution raising eyebrows when I attempted communication. It took one and one-half years to complete a single Easy Crossword puzzle. One puzzle, not the entire book. I relearned numbers and their relationships playing solitaire as I lay in bed. I learned to stand, then walk again; first with a walker, then years with a cane. I learned to read and write again, haltingly at first.

Poetry saved me. It gave me my first words. One morning I woke and picked up the empty journal by my bed, lifted the pen by its side and for the first time in more than a year I wrote nonsense for two pages until a poem suddenly appeared. This is the poem:

Snippets

like puppets

of the imagination

strung together

in the mind,

all mine.

With you they dance

in the breeze

of conversation.

Disjointed,

unanointed by grammar.

Flailing, distracted

emotion woodenly enacted.

Words tossed

together and apart

from the wound that is my heart.

what a performance!

I walk without aids now, 1-2 miles at a time. I garden. I paint. I write a blogs of poetry, commentaries, political essays. Before health restricted my ability to engage in personal contact with others I was able to be socially and politically active, personally. Now, I rely on words to show love and move others to action. Words I once lost are now my only connection to a fully lived life.

I worry for Covid long-haulers and what they will go through. At least they will be believed. Those of us with CFS(sometimes called ME, CFIDS etc) have seldom been believed. Only within the last year has my illness been given an ICD code although it has been a recognized disease by the CDC for decades. The reason this happened is because researches recognize the same symptoms in Covid long-haulers and thought it prudent to look at those with CFS. However, no data was organized enough to research since without an ICD code there was no effort to track patients like myself. Our medical histories are hidden and untraceable. My records will show only “easily fatigued.” That is the least of the symptoms; the result of the struggle against the underlying systems fails. Fatigue is not the disease itself. My hope is that we will not dismiss nor diminish the long-haulers who seek medical care in the decades to come. My hope is they will find the words needed to connect them to more fully lived lives. Life is good. The struggle is worth it. I pray they never lose hope. I pray they find the poetry of their lives.

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY, POETRY

BIDEN COLLEGE LOAN REPAYMENT PLAN

Photo by Stanley Morales on Pexels.com

I began my work-life in the neighborhood. My brother and I collected newspapers, bottles and cans to recycle for pennies at the corner store or at the junkyard across the street along the alley. We were 4 and 6 years old pulling our wagon along behind us. I have been earning a living since then. As I got older I washed woodwork and carted groceries for older ladies who could no longer stoop, bend nor carry. I used a spoon to trim borders as my brother cut their grass. By age 12 I was babysitting. By age 14 I was teaching summer religion class to kids who did not attend our Catholic school. I was assigned the first graders. At 15 I got a work permit to run the Little League snack bar. At 16 I worked after schooI and on week-ends at a local dry cleaner.

My grandparents were Italian immigrants. My parents worked through their childhoods to help support the family, so what they expected of me was part of our family history. We working children never doubted our self-worth. We did not need certificates of achievement or trophies to tell us we could be proud of our accomplishments. Yet, I earned those too in my academic life.

I had a rich academic life taught by Dominican Sisters whose goal was to elevate our intellect and secure our souls. The arch stones above either side of the door to enter our school read, “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free,” and “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.” Those words still guide me.

My mother was the only one of her siblings to attain a high school diploma. She skipped two grades to graduate at age 16. Her first job was Society Editor at the local Staten Island, NY newspaper.  Impossible to believe, but true. Two years later she became the Executive Assistant to the CEO of  chemical company, running the plant in his absence during world war two as he focused on raising war bonds. 

My dad and his brothers were high school graduates. No one in Newark, Ohio would hire Italian men at that time so the day after graduation he hitchhiked, with five cents left in his pocket , to enlist at the Great Lakes Naval Training Center. He learned to swim thrown into a tank of deep water and was soon on board a destroyer escorting Lend Lease supplies to Great Britain across the north Atlantic, dodging U-boats.  

Two years later, assigned to the Naval Base at Pearl Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii his ship was one of two out on maneuvers when the base was attacked by Japanese aircraft. He never forgot the screams of the men drowning in the oil fires as his ship returned to the harbor. Within hours his ship was headed to the South Pacific, where he served for the duration of the war. 

After an ambush on a U.S. convoy through the straits between islands his ship was so badly damaged it lay dead in the water. As night fell, his destroyer lay dark and silent, and undetected by the Japanese. They retreated, not realizing the ship was still afloat. It was towed back to the New Jersey naval yard for major repairs. 

Dad met Mom at a Catholic Youth dance and courted her during the time his ship was in dry dock. He also got a job at a factory to supplement the income he was sending home to his mother. After marrying Mom, he also shared his income with her mother. This is what family meant to Mom and Dad; everyone working to help each other, sharing all they had.

I was the first girl in my entire extended family to attend college. On the day I left, Dad gave me $20 of the $50 he earned each week. A huge sacrifice, I knew. My education was to be financed by work-study (I became a resident advisor),a federal loan, and a federal grant. I had little savings since what I had been earning paid for my Catholic high school tuition and books, dental and health care, and once in awhile a vinyl album of classical music. 

I read every assignment in the time before classes started and the three weeks after, returning the assigned textbooks at the last minute in which I was eligible for a complete refund. I relied on the notes I had taken and those taken during the lectures. This practice got me through undergraduate, graduate and law school. I worked a second job as a part-time clerical worker off-campus, and worked full-time wherever I could find work during breaks. During finals week, I used packets of sugar and hot chocolate, pads of butter, and cartons of milk from the cafeteria to make batches of fudge in my soup pot and sold it to fellow students once the snack machines in the dorm ran out of “study aides.” I made the money I needed to buy the books for the next quarter.

My frugality was limitless. Even to me this sounds like an oxymoron. But to anyone who does not have a family able to pave their way with financial assistance, this makes total sense.I still could not afford to pay for the one dinner not covered by the cafeteria food plan I was eligible for as a resident assistant.  When the cook who ran the cafeteria food line every Sunday night realized I never ordered food, and simply walked through with my roommates she questioned me. I explained I was a scholarship student, so came only for company, and the free coffee. She decided I needed to eat and gave me a free hamburger and fries…every Sunday that entire year. The kindness of strangers should never be underestimated. I try to emulate this woman every chance I get. I know the power of such generosity and risk-taking. I always feared she might lose her job. Still, hungry, I ate.

The discussion of the Biden decision to partially forgive student debt is distressing in its ignorance. Wealthy students do not rely on student aid. Even upper middle-class students whose parental assistance is supplemented by student financial aid, do not face the same challenges those who entirely rely on financial aid when it is time to repay those loans. People rely on the connections within their economic class. Guess who benefits. I am happy to pay my taxes. I know they enable the common good and keep my nation strong. We all win when we are all strong. We all have time to raise strong families when we can all earn living wages. When we have a single job we have time to study issues, vote, make wiser decisions about where we should be headed and who shall lead us. Who gains by weakening the economic hopes of our young people?

In 1978 I completed law school and took my first job owing $87,000 despite working full-time my entire academic career. The 5% cap on repayment would have made a world of difference for a student like myself. I finished paying off my loan. But, delayed marriage, child bearing, buying a home. I chose a law career in public service, earning less than if I had found work in the private sector. At that time, women were not easily accepted in the male-dominated practice of law. Graduates with family ties to the profession, personal connections to job offerers had an easier time, but the women still faced more obstacles than the men. They still do. African-American students, even more so. Those struggles continue.  The class-status of those who take out loans matters. We all know this. Will this Biden plan help women and people of color? Yes. Will it help the working poor? Yes. Does this matter? Of course.

I finally bought a home. I will die before it is paid off. 

If the limit on repayment had been in place for me, and others like me, I would have been able to escape the bondage of that loan and contributed even more to the economy of this country. I could have been financially secure enough to purchase a home and build wealth. I could have helped my parents more, to live more prosperous lives, not rely on food programs, buy a new car, replace broken appliances, move to better neighborhood, get better health care. I and my family would have been lifted up, not held down and held back. That is what I hoped for with a college degree. That is what I eventually achieved, after my parents had died, once my loan was paid off. 

Other nations invest in their young people and provide universal education through college. Are their taxes higher? Yes. Their millionaires pay their fair tax share. Ours should, too. We are the richest nation…ever…on the face of the earth. We can do this. What Biden proposes is a moderate effort to at least alleviate the burden enough, on those in greatest need, that they will be able to more fully participate in building full lives and building real wealth. That builds a stronger middle class. That makes the nation stronger for all of us. 

Forgiving student debt, capping repayment levels will encourage more people to attend college. They will no longer fear being crippled by debt. There will be a real pay-off for graduating. It will enable students to attend full-time and graduate sooner. It will encourage students to pursue advanced and professional degrees. It will build a momentum of economic growth for future generations. The economic momentum, undercut by tax cuts for the wealthy and attacks on social support programs since the 1980s, will be resurrected. Parents will no longer wonder if their children will be able to reach the same, or even surpass, their own economic achievements. 

Finally, framing this discussion as one facing off working class against the elites is an old and hateful trope. Technical and vocational training beyond high school also creates student debt. Arguments that helping college students hurts non-college students is inane. Do you really think all those young people working in restaurants would not prefer better paying jobs? Who could afford college on tip money?

 And what makes one job “classy” and another “trashy”? For such a discussion implies that not all work is equal. But, all work is equal. If we learned nothing else about the  value of workers during the pandemic we did learn this one thing: Every single task has value, every worker has value. Hope itself has  value. Biden’s plan gives young people hope. This is the truth. And the truth shall set us free. It should make college free; but, I am happy we at least have this new plan.

2 Comments

Filed under COMMENTARY

STAY TUNED:OBSTRUCTIONISM IS STILL ON THE TABLE,By Louise Annarino,November 9,2012

STAY TUNED:OBSTRUCTIONISM IS STILL ON THE TABLE,By Louise Annarino,November 9,2012

STAY TUNED:OBSTRUCTIONISM IS STILL ON THE TABLE,By Louise Annarino,November 9,2012


— Read on annarinowrites.wordpress.com/2012/11/09/stay-tunedobstructionism-is-still-on-the-tableby-louise-annarinonovember-92012/

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY, POLITICS

State’s Rights and Fascist Court ?

I just ate an entire bag of Milano double dark chocolate cookies. Better that than crying in outrage that separation of church and state has overcome our constitutional rights as white politicians within the Republican Party exploit the personal faith of voters to retain their control of government. Why? Because of their racism and sexism, and gender fears. And, to allow corporate and private wealth to stay in power through them, personally rewarding them financially and supporting filling their campaign chests.

These protagonists blocked the Equal Rights Amendment for women in my youth. Women finally got the right to vote but it and other civil rights have never explicitly been assured. This is one reason the privacy rights under the constitution was used to explain why women have a legal civil right to decide their health care rights and family planning rights.

This same reasoning was used to protect a couple’s right to use birth control. That right is now also facing elimination according to Justice Thomas’ dissent.

The Supreme Court is our greatest and final protector of our freedoms and civil rights. Today, the court threw women to the wolves. They invaded the privacy right of a woman to her own body. They destroyed a woman’s right to safeguard her mental and physical health. Her rights no longer belong to her. They belong to state legislatures. women no longer have rights equal to men in this nation.

We have been here before. Despite the end of enslavement of African-Americans recognition of their civil rights took another 100 years to secure. And, those rights, including the right to vote are again, still, under siege. The Voting Rights Act has been eviscerated. Will the supreme Court’s States Rights Rule now be applied to any individual’s right to equality and freedoms? This case opens that door. The decision today directs us through that door.

The violence and intimidation against women is now supported by our Supreme Court, using its judicial powers. I fear it will soon be the same for people of color, LGBTQT community … indeed any group the white supremacist leaders supported by our churches think they have a right to control.

Today’s decision is far worse than overturning abortion rights. It overturns equal rights. I fear it is not only women who are under threat. Our very identity as a free society , as an American society, was destroyed today.

I am out of cookies. Out of words. Only tears remain. Fascist Court? Not usually 2 words that go together. They do now!

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY, POLITICS

SPEAK FOR WOMEN

The women in the suite of 16 students next door ran into my Resident Advisor room without knocking, some in tears, others shouting for my immediate attention. Their suite-mate was lying on the bathroom floor in a pool of blood after returning from the residence hall next door half an hour before, and complaining of pain. She begged them not to get help. They feared they had waited too long. I rushed to her side and shouted to call for an ambulance. Realizing she was hemorrhaging from the vaginal area I pushed towels up against that area trying to stem the flow of blood as she sobbed and begged, “Don’t tell anyone, please.” I went  with the ambulance and waited in the Emergency Room as the doctors and nurses tried to save her life after a butchered abortion. This was the sixth young woman I had tried to save that quarter. That became a pattern. Back then, 1 in 4 female students were victims of rape, not always stranger-rape.

When I was finally allowed to see her, I gained her permission to call her parents whom I knew would want to be at her side. She, like I, was Catholic. She had been raped by her new boyfriend who thought her “NO” was a mere tease when he forced sexual intercourse upon her after “heavy petting”. Her guilty feelings nearly led to her death as she delayed getting medical help. I understood her feelings after 12 years of Catholic school. But, I understood even more profoundly that feelings of guilt are a small price to pay for survival. She agreed. Her parents arrived. We spoke with them together. They forgave her. This suffering victim should have not needed anyone’s forgiveness.

Abortions were illegal then. Women with money, or monied parents with connections, were able to get abortions in private clinics, or by family doctors paid off, or by traveling outside the country. Abortion laws meant nothing to the rich. Abortion laws meant death or maiming to the middle class and poor. To girls with consciences honed smooth by religious training it often meant shameful death. This infuriated me then. It infuriates me now. No one should replace a woman’s conscious choice, her free will, her personal conscience, her control over her ability to survive. Every man has those rights. Women are likewise entitled to those rights.

During my years working in residence halls I helped many young women injured by illegal abortions. Many of the women went to a fellow student who had experience using a clothes hanger to do the job. That’s right, a clothes hanger. Many of these women developed such severe infections they were scarred for life, unable to bear future children, suffering many miscarriages and worse. The entire situation was barbaric.

My church insists on the sanctity of life. I, too, treasure the sanctity of life, the sanctity of all lives including the lives of young women. Who has the right to interfere with her efforts to maintain the sanctity of her own life ? 

I asked our priest when I first learned about abortions  what should a woman do if her life was in danger from a pregnancy. Did she have to die instead of abort a pregnancy ? Did she have a moral right to abort in order to avoid her own death or severe injury? He told me that that kind of decision belonged to the woman and her husband. 

I did not like the part of that answer that placed the woman’s life in her husband’s hands. I had seen enough abuse by husbands and boyfriends in my neighborhood to not trust such decisions to another person. But, I appreciated Father’s position that the woman had a moral right to choose her own life, particularly if she had other children relying upon her. If the mother dies, the family fails, he said. He honored women and the role they play in society. He explained this question did not have a clear answer so had to be between the woman, her doctor, and her family. 

Today, I wonder if that priest would be reprimanded by his Bishop. I hope not. Yet, the American church’s  current moral positions do not allow for such grey areas. Rallies are held at churches. Crosses representing aborted fetuses grace church lawns. Catholic organizers chant outside clinics and harass women seeking help at Planed Parenthood clinics. It is an ugliness no church should sanction, no man of the cloth should approve. Can you imagine Jesus doing so? I cannot. Do these groups attend church sanctioned harassment of military recruiting stations as young persons enlist to go kill other human beings? Killing enemies during war is not a sin I have been told by religious teachers. there are competing moral rights. Are there no longer competing moral rights when women’s wellbeing is at stake?

I knew that relying on the moral teachings by other human beings might not always make sense at my senior year  girls’ silent retreat at a nearby shrine. At the session on human sexuality, the speaker told us that the newly-developed birth control pill worked by destroying the fertilized egg. I knew this was not correct. Birth control pills simply prevented release of an egg by the ovary. So, there was no egg to be fertilized by sperm during sex. One could have sex and not get pregnant. This sounded like a great idea to me. But, relying on this erroneous information became the basis for the church to opine taking birth control pills is a sin in itself. WHAT? “But it does not do that”, I insisted. There is nothing to destroy! there can be no fetus. The speaker insisted I was incorrect. It left me wondering why such lie would be promoted. 

As I explored this topic with other religious pastors of my soul, few acknowledged I was correct about the biology . Those who did so then argued that sex outside marriage is the real sin. Sexual intercourse itself, unless creating new life within the bounds of marriage, is the sin. I asked how a God who created such lovely communion of bodies and souls, when it had no affect on anyone other than the parties involved (so long as the parties had made no vows to others) could be inherently sinful. I never got a good answer. What do these men of God and their parish communities really believe? Or, do they simply fear sex?

Religious arguments are not the point, however meaningful they are to many persons, including myself. The real issue, the only issue, is woman’s right to choose how to live her life, plan her family, protect her health both physical and emotional, do what is best for her other children, and for future children. 

A fetus is not a person by law. Birth is the point when one is considered a person by law. Once laws are changed to recognize a fetus as a person with full legal protections, this will apply to all laws. Lawsuits will be possible against anyone, any company, any organization etc. whose acts affect the fetus. Roe v. Wade only allowed full freedom to women seeking abortion until the fetus they carried would be capable of survival outside the womb. Once that occurred, there are some restrictions on the right to an abortion. The other lie currently in play is that there are routine late-pregnancy abortions. There are not. Roe would not allow it. It only occurs under dire circumstances. 

Still, the woman’s right to survive was protected by Roe. Overturning Roe would overturn a woman’s right to survive. It will be sanctioning injuring, maiming, even killing of women. Because, abortions will not cease. The rich will still get safe abortions. Most women will be in back alleys being butchered.

We cannot quietly watch this happen. Our grand-daughters cannot be allowed to bleed to death and face criminal charges. Those days ended in my lifetime. I cannot silently allow them to resurrect again. Saving our children begins with saving their mothers. 

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY, POLITICS

A SENSE OF HUMOR CAN SAVE THE WORLD

A sense of humor may save us all. One cannot grip a weapon of words or worsewhile laughing. Some of us actually fall down laughing as muscles relax beyond support of our frames, or our frame of mind. It is just too difficult to attack another while laughing, especially if one can laugh at one’s self. The serious-minded sometimes misunderstand such self-effacing laughs. They mistakenly believe one is laughing at them. 

I love to laugh. It stops the fingers from reaching for weapons I carry in my mind’s pocket, the sharp words I can wield like a knife. Better I laugh aloud during an argument than pull out such words and attack. 

This is one reason the entertainers I most respect are comedians. Court jesters who poke the kings and courts of the world to relieve the tensions in their realms allow peace to reign instead. Keep the world laughing and perhaps war will hold its breath.

My Dad was a comedian. Not as a profession, as a personal trait. His silly grin infected anyone who was within its view. Some of his best work was at funerals. I watched him charm the smiles from mourners, restore their joy and fond memories of the deceased. Quietly he worked the room, or the procession of cars halted on busy paths at the cemetery. Walking form car to car he would stop at each one. In moments the car was shaking and passengers’ shoulders chopping up the view with laughing. As soon as he started the laughter he would move on to the next car. Dad was a master of silliness.

Mom lived life as if it were an Italian opera, full of high drama. Dad was the court jester who brought his audience of children to their feet in glee. Mom learned to make that silly grin, too. We all did. We are a family of grinning fools. We learned to never take life’s difficulties seriously, and to seriously dismiss life’s accomplishments as a humorous surprise. 

We were taught to laugh at ourselves. We were taught to admit our human frailty, and view it as a reason for laughter. What a gift from our parents. The gift of not fearing our mistakes, nor fearing to admit them. The ability to sincerely apologize. The ability welcome accountability. The ability to laugh and move on with forgiveness. The ability to openly admit defeat with a smile. The ability to fight our stubborn natures with humor.

I must admit, others often think our wry humorous response to our own mistakes is sarcasm, the lowest form of humor. Sometimes, when our pain is great, the lowest form is all we can muster. I must remind myself to raise the humor up a notch, or two or three. I will never be so good at this as my Dad was. I am too much like Mom and enjoy the Italian opera’s drama, the pull of its force which can mute the humor with tears.  Balance is the most I can hope for, until the laughter destroys my balance and I fall laughing at your feet; knowing if I can make you laugh, too, you cannot stomp me into the dust.

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY, FAMILY STORIES, POLITICS

Second Amendment

The conception that unrestricted gun ownership is guaranteed by the 2d. Amendment is a false idea. from discussions recorded by those present as the Constitution was being approved and amendments voted upon indicate that the 2d. Amendment’s purpose was to allow for militias. Our militia SYSTEM is controlled by governors of each state, allowed to arm their citizens in a National Guard, under the federal government’s authority. It had nothing to do with an individual right to bear any and all arms. It was enacted to allow for state militias. Governments-local,state-federal can restrict individual gun purchases, manufacture, and ownership. The idea they cannot do so was constructed by the NRA only recently to improve gun sales, (think of the payoffs ),to sow dissension (funded by Russia), and to uphold white supremacy and control African-Americans who had gained the right to vote and gained more power after the Civil Rights Movement.  Fear of people of color is ingrained in white Americans.  This is a tool to manipulate us. Also, as immigrants  from white Europe declined and immigrants of color increased NRA played on the fear of white Americans. Gun sales shot up. The Republican Party which in recent history opposed civil rights for African-Americans, affirmative action, integrated schools etc. embraced the NRA’s position to advance an agenda which would protect Republican vote and control of the levers of government. NRA funds support these republicans, and a few democratic politicians also accepting the easy money. 

Take a moment to think about this and connect the dots. Our children should not be pawns for this white supremacy agenda. Look at the position on guns by candidates at EVERY level. Those claiming they can not do anything about gun regulation because of the 2d Amendment are liars. Vote them out. Always ask them their position on the 2d amendment. If they lie about that they are lying about a lot more. I am on my knees begging like Sen. Chris Murphy, “save our children.” Do not let white supremacy destroy the safety a single person. Do not stand by and silently watch. speak with your friends and colleagues. Beg them if necessary. 

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY, POLITICS

FALLING FROM A MORE PERFECT UNION

Alito’s words stilled my own.

A falling body has no time

to waste on words when breath

is so precious and undermined

by space displaced by diving

thoughts toward a very dark place.

It is not just Roe which falls with me;

but, likely Obergefell, Griswold 

and Loving, too. So old,

I recall them all. The sacred tome

which gives the rights owed humanity

is our constitution which gives privacy a home

of safety, freedom and security.

Alito steals them all from me.

The greater fear is that he would say

mob rule would bind our hands again 

with state’s rights to up-end a nation’s democracy.

The word privacy does not exist, so he says.

Nor does the word slavery, nor contraception,

nor sexuality, nor women’s and persons of color’s

right to vote and have a say in lives they own;

because they don’t in the words originally

written for white land-owning gentlemen alone.

But that is the  point, one no longer hidden.

White male supremacy, and protecting the wealthy

is Republicans’ true north. Which is why 

even women support letting democracy die.

Why even kind men still vote for extremist

candidates they know can save their wealth

by telling the most outrageous lies.

Stolen election is not the first lie.

The first was that women and Africans are less

than any white man of wealth could allow

to be free, for fear their fields of wealth

once shared, would lie fallow. 

I thought I could no longer write poetry

while my love for country makes me cry

knowing my beloved Law is often denied.

The law is sacrosanct, you see. 

Alito’s words mean the courts are no longer free.

And that will be the death of the rights

of you and me, and perhaps the world

whom my country once led toward democracy.

The world is falling along with me.

I am not alone if you join me and vote 

for those who would protect us as we fall,

and right the wrong words which stand so tall

we can no longer recognize truth at all.

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY, POETRY, POLITICS