Tag Archives: criminal prosecution

MORE ON WAR

Photo by Yevhen Sukhenko on Pexels.com

My father fought the War

to End all Wars.

My Godfather fought the War

that has no end.

My brother fought the War

that was a police action.

My nephew fought the War

undeclared for Kuwait’s liberation

and Hussein’s annihilation.

My great-nephew fights the War

To save an autocrat’s administration.

We all fight the War

opposing cruel opposition to immigration.

Once more, people of peace

protest a war taking place abroad

and its counterpart taking place in our streets.

All to save a man from accusation

of pedophilia, rape and sheer brutality 

who will be asked for an explanation

during his interrogation

which could lead to his incarceration.

Have I got that right?

It is not his sons nor daughter who will fight.

But, yours and mine.

Have I got that right?

It all comes from The Right

so I must be Right

or face the consequences.

Have I got that right?

We make such war at our cost

until all is lost.

Have I got that right?

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY, POLITICS

RULES OF DISRULE

Photo by Sora Shimazaki on Pexels.com

Rules for lawyers:

Never try a divorce case 

on the day the judge 

fought with his wife.

Never try a disability case

before an alcoholic judge.

These are the usual rules

when trying to maintain impartiality

to reach a decision consistent with the law

and not flawed by human will

which should be set aside

to follow the dictum of this land

that no man is above the law.

The law is turned on its head

by Judge Cannon and her MAGA crew.

Attorneys of good will and sound ethics

now face  bending of these rules:

Never try a criminal case

when the criminal conspires with the judge.

Never try an emergency order

before a judge intent on delay.

No judge forum shopping is allowed.

So find a court where the only choice

is a judge the criminal appointed.

Judicial impartiality is a rule

oft’ influenced, it is true, by experience and inclination,

but not by partiality, blind to the rule of law 

instead of impartial justice;

but not by a judge who rules

before the evidence is even given,

but not by a judge who rules

that the man who gave her her job

is above the law she pledged herself to.

How can a judge be allowed to sit

in a court where law is not followed

and where blatant disrule becomes the rule?

Impartial judges sew the threads

holding the law together. 

Judges who put down the needle

and rip the fabric of law

can destroy justice for us all.

Tearing apart the fabric of law

will leave us all naked,

vulnerable to autocratic rule.

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY