Tag Archives: racism

Lift Every Voice and Sing,by Louise Annarino,3-2-2013

Lift Every Voice and Sing,by Louise Annarino,3-2-2013

Lift Every Voice and Sing,by Louise Annarino,3-2-2013


— Read on annarinowrites.wordpress.com/2013/03/02/lift-every-voice-and-singby-louise-annarino3-2-2013/

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY, POLITICS

Weak Cores

Saving face

By creating truth

Is the only means of escape

From harsh reality

For those whose core

Is thinned and weak

By lack of moral exercise.

Bread and circuse

Did Rome in.

History ignored

Is repeated evermore.

Distraction through attraction

Diverts the gaze, the ear, the tongue.

This is who we live among.

Doing what is correct

Does not reflect the Right

Constantly claiming false

It’s moral might

Over those whose outrage

Threatens their control,

Their wealth, their privilege.

New faces in new places

Where they were not allowed before

Distort the world view

Of the autocratic few.

It takes strong core

Muscles to stand tall

Before the attack of falsehood

Destroys us all.

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY

GRIEF LINES ABOUT THE BROW

GRIEF LINES ABOUT THE BROW

1-15-2022

I held grief at bay

in tightened fists

determined not to allow

its escape, until I lay

it down upon the page,

Where it sapped my strength.

Taking up the pen

is little help today

when the nib etches lines

of grief about my brow,

too close to allow the flow

of ink upon the page.

Democracy means more to those

More recently saved upon its shores.

The lands of autocrats and hypocrites,

we thought, had been left

behind, beyond our pained sight;

now resurrected by the Republican right.

A Right reinforced by clerics bent

on reasserting ties long rent

between church and state,

Now reinstated by the Court

and pro-life misogynist dictum

making women victims.

The Right backlash to Obama

is a fierce and hateful trauma

which dares to take away

our diversity and our vote,

our personhood and culture,

our history and democracy.

Grief is still heavy today

but less than yesterday.

Today ink flows steadily,

freely, hopefully daring leaders

to find the courage to save the vote,

and this beloved country.

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY, POLITICS

Happy New Year

Out with the old.

In with the new.

Throw away society

Is nothing new.

Long lines of history

Started this brew.

Custom is not custom made

When everyone agrees.

No person better than another

If we could truly see.

Celebrations followed time

In its global rounds

Until the ball with all its hopes

Dropped roaringly to ground.

I wish you Happy New Year

Both with joy and dismay

That too many doors will shut again

On this new year’s first day.

Across the globe

We hear the whoosh and slam

of shutting doors and clicking locks

where too few give a damn.

On this day I resolve

To open wide my doors

And to welcome in with grace

Those seeking a safe shore.

1 Comment

Filed under POETRY

Not My Job to Handle Your Feelings

Over 25 years ago our state bar association convened a group of women lawyers, 2 from each county, to address sexist laws and regulations, and court practices. I represented the county in which I practiced law. We met on Malcolm X’s birthday so I implored the group to also address racism as well. It seemed, I suggested, that only addressing sexism was insufficient to create justice. And as Malcolm said,” If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem”. The group agreed to expand its review and its reach.

The breakout sessions were useful. We formed sub-groups to research specific areas. At the close of the day the Chief Justice of our state Supreme Court, a man, and the president of the state bar association, a man, spoke to the group. They appeared a bit unsettled by our enthusiasm for the project. My comments citing Malcolm X contributed to their appearing to be ill at ease. One of the men advised us to ” go easy on the men” because our efforts and comments would ” hurt their feelings” and make them uncomfortable. They told us we need to “help them with their feelings” as we discussed and delivered our findings. It might be too upsetting for them.

That did it! I rose up out of my seat and announced that as women, and as African-Americans the lawyers in the room already had to handle our own emotions because of the sexism and racism we experienced from those same men. And it took all our strength to do so. It was not our job to handle their feelings, too. They would have to handle their own feelings.

I explained that we agreed to help our bar association and our state courts correct that sexism and racism which had made our justice system so oppressive to women and African-Americans. The least the men could do was handle their own feelings, responses and actions.the room grew so quiet one could have heard a pin drop. The men paled, and shrugged helplessly. They had no clue how offensive their comments had been. They were gentlemen and I was …. not.

This belief that the oppressed are expected to ” tread lightly” so as to ” protect men’s feelings” is exactly was the police ask if those protesting the police brutality that hides behind the Blue Line. That is not our job. The police who understand better than any the effects of police brutality need to handle their own feelings and their own actions. And those who stand up and advise us to not make them ” uncomfortable” ask too much.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

End the 400 Years Long War in America

As a small child, I asked my Dad who served in WWII why soldiers called the Japanese “Japs” and worse names; and he explained: it is hard to kill another person, almost impossible to take human life. So soldiers use derogatory names which denigrate opposing soldiers to non-human status. Only after depriving the opposite side of their humanity can you kill them.

I noticed this during the Vietnam-Nam war when we used “ gooks ”. During the Iraq war, we used “towel heads” etc.

This is also what we did to justify slavery, using a word I can never utter, but so ingrained I do not need to tell you what it is. It is the same word we use to justify police brutality and murder of our fellow citizens. It is the word we use to justify our taking of Black lives ability to survive and thrive from cradle to grave post-slavery.

We may not use the word aloud but it has become part of our lexicon.

Some wars go on for hundreds of years. Some wars do not end by bringing home soldiers. But this war must end now. We must “bring back” law enforcement. To a place it has never been.

Instead, it has returned to the slave era of trackers searching out and punishing runners.

Instead we have a president, Vice-President, Attorney General and much of our populace, including police unions who have militarized our law enforcement. Instead, they militarize common citizens and encourage private militias armed for war.

It is no coincidence that we have allowed this to happen. Defund the militarization of law enforcement. Stop the militarization of private militias. End the war.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Zimmerman Not Guilty of Murder of Trayvon Martin? Take Off the Hoods,Americans, By Louise Annarino,July 15,2013

Zimmerman Not Guilty of Murder of Trayvon Martin? Take Off The Hoods,Americans! By Louise Annarino,July 15

 

Used to be the Ku Klux Klan, men…even women… of every education level and background including law enforcement, donned white robes and hoods to protect their identity and hide their shame. Their stated purpose was to meet out justice to African-Americans who had crossed over a boundary; and,in some way failed to acknowledge the superiority and power of the white community.  Perhaps, a 14 year old African-American boy smiled at a white married woman as he entered her small grocery http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/till/ . Perhaps a 37 year old African-American father of three children spent his days registering voters and seeking the end of Jim Crow laws as a  N.A.A.C.P field organizer http://www.history.com/news/7-things-you-should-know-about-medgar-evers.

 

The murders of Emmet Till and Medgar Evers are well known, but every African-American, boys and men in particular, endure retaliatory acts based on racial bias and racial animus every day. They are familiar with expressions of bigotry and punishment justified by white fear. The white robes are gone now,replaced by an unreasonable white fear instututionalized in the law, and unquestioned by the white media.

 

Attorneys on each side of the George Zimmerman murder trial scrupulously avoided the racial motivation for the murder. The judge ordered the phrase “racial profiling” not be used. White “legal experts” on every channel affirmed this approach, as that required by a unbiased court. They are all wrong. The only way the court could have been free of bias would have been to acknowledge the racial bias underlying the case.  Lady Justice is blindfolded but she is not stupid. She must not pretend race is not a motivation to kill. Our history clearly tells us otherwise. She need not play the fool; unless, she fears her power and authority can be used to empower scary African-American boys and men.

 

I expected the defense team to provide a strong defense woven into a story of why it was reasonable for a fully-grown man,trained in martial arts and armed with a gun, to fear a 17 year old African-American boy on his way home from a “munchies-run”. I expected the defense team to discount the boy’s right to defend himself from the attack his cultural history and his phone friend warned him to expect from his silent stalker. And,I expected the defense team to turn Trayvon’s self-defense into the justification of Zimmerman’s fear.

 

I naively did not expect the prosecution team to ignore racial bias.  Special Prosecutor Angela Corey stated “This case has never been about race or the right to bear arms. We believe this case all along was about boundaries, and George Zimmerman exceeded those boundaries.”  http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2013/0714/Zimmerman-not-guilty-Victory-for-new-kind-of-civil-rights-era The prosecution was eager to talk about boundaries,a euphemism for racial animus. But of course, we refuse to admit the existence of racial bigotry. We refuse even when we are charged to seek justice for the murder of an African-American teenager who did NOTHING wrong;certainly,nothing to explain the irrational or unreasonable fear proclaimed by Zimmerman’s attorneys. The prosecution failed to admit race drove motivation until the last minutes of the trial. It allowed the defense to hide race under the hood,as many of us do when we face racial animus. What we fear is not African-Americans.What we fear is our own racism.

 

Now, the “legal experts” are proclaiming it is impossible to prove racial animus led to Trayvon’s death. The only reason they make this claim is beacuse they cannot comprehend, or refuse to acknowledge, the continuing and historical irrationality of white fear. No one who is willing to admit this “fear turned to hate” is hogwash believes the DOJ cannot find such a connection. On THE VIEW today,the “legal expert” Dan Abrams responded to factually-based questions and comments by Whoopi Goldberg and Sherri Shepherd by dismissing their comments as “emotional’. While they clearly felt emotional, their comments were no less rational this his own. In fact, they were more so http://abc.go.com/shows/the-view/blogs/hot-topics/george-zimmerman-verdict.

 

The lack of racial intelligence among our legal experts, prosecutors,defense attorneys,judges, media pundits and manyof us white Americans is institutionalized. This must change. twe must do all we can to raise our racial I.Q. We no longer wear physical hoods over our heads to hide our identity and our shame. We wear figurative hoods of ignorance over our heads to pretend we have no reason to feel shame. Take off the hoods,America! We cannot change what we refuse to face…our selves.

 

1 Comment

Filed under COMMENTARY

Justice and Mercy,by Louise Annarino,March 20,2013

Justice and Mercy, By Louise Annarino,March 20,2013

 

Two words seem to define the response to the rape of a teen-age girl by teen-age boys in Steubenville,Ohio: fear and loathing. I am aware of the crime itself and the ancillary threats,denials,cover-ups,and diverse opinions expressed by the public and news media.I heard the apologies of those convicted and the statement made by the victim’s mother. The hate expressed against the rape victim and her defenders, and that expressed against the perpetrators and their defenders leave me saddened and dismayed. Having experienced sexual assault as a young woman, and lived with nightmares and flashbacks since, my heart bleeds for the victim in this case and for all women. We women face objectification and sexism daily. However,I suggest we put aside our fear and loathing and reflect upon two other words: justice and mercy.

 

Blindfolded Lady Law holds a set of scales,but not merely to weigh evidence. Those two plates on the scale also represent justice and mercy. When judges apply the law they must provide justice for all parties, and mercy for all parties.

 

As a prison social worker I worked with inmates who had committed truly heinous crimes,and some less appalling. By serving a sentence of incarceration justice was served. By participating in rehabilitation,mercy was applied. As a social worker,I sought to balance the two, as Lady Justice personifies. When I later became an attorney, I continued to seek justice and mercy for my clients. Only when justice is balanced with mercy do we create peace,for each victim, for each perpetrator, and for our entire community.

 

It is impossible to overestimate the value of balance. After any sports injury, surgery or illness; when planting a garden or teaching new ideas; while painting a picture or building a fence, the first thing one does is find and then maintain balance. Whether working to create a just society, a rehabilitation program,or a federal budget we must strive for balance. Justice and mercy. Both are essential.

 

All boys and young men,all girls and young women are in desperate need of our protection and guidance. We cannot expect a child born in poverty, or awash in the acid drip of discrimination,or subject to the benign neglect of overworked parents to stand strong against the sexually derogatory messages  in their dress-language-social media-music-movies-television-gaming. We think because boys and girls talk,dress and act out adult behavior that they are mature. They are still children. They make stupid and harmful decisions. This fact is more readily acknowledged for boys who are white, athletes or scholars than boys who are sagging and hanging on a corner. Too often our latent racism blinds our reality. Boys carrying guns in gangs are still boys. Girls exploring their sexuality are still girls. How can we expect our children to show self-respect when we adults show them so little respect?

 

Decisions made by boys and girls have consequences; often,adult consequences. Facing the consequences of one’s actions is just. Caring for those facing consequences they never imagined in their young minds and hearts is merciful. Mercy does not condone sexually objectifying girls and women; but, it may provide a means to address the problem. Let us respect our children by paying attention to their needs, and being willing to pay the cost. How can we expect our children to deny their self-gratification when we are unwilling to sacrifice our own?

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under COMMENTARY

Lift Every Voice and Sing,by Louise Annarino,3-2-2013

Lift Every Voice and Sing,By Louise Annarino,3-02-2013

“Our minds fasten on that single moment on the bus — Mrs. Parks alone in that seat, clutching her purse, staring out a window, waiting to be arrested. That moment tells us something about how change happens, or doesn’t happen . . . We so often spend our lives as if in a fog, accepting injustice, rationalizing inequity, tolerating the intolerable. Like the bus driver, but also like the passengers on the bus, we see the way things are — children hungry in a land of plenty, entire neighborhoods ravaged by violence, families hobbled by job loss or illness — and we make excuses for inaction, and we say to ourselves, that’s not my responsibility, there’s nothing I can do. Rosa Parks tells us there’s always something we can do. She tells us that we all have responsibilities, to ourselves and to one another. She reminds us that this is how change happens — not mainly through the exploits of the famous and the powerful, but through the countless acts of often anonymous courage and kindness and fellow feeling and responsibility that continually, stubbornly, expand our conception of justice — our conception of what is possible.” – President Barack Obama,February 27,2013

On February 27,2013 in Statuary Hall at the nations Capitol,President Obama in the presence of the family of Ms. Rosa Parks, unveiled a full-body bronze statue memorializing that moment when she brought racism to its knees as she refused to stand, give up her seat to a white rider, and move to the back of a bus. It was not the first time someone had protested a move to the back of the bus, but it was the first time a nation came to her defense through the organizing efforts of the local NAACP chapter, and soon other civil rights organizations. While it is true a single act can change a nation, it can only do so when it galvanizes others to join in that change.

Rosa Parks’ quiet dignity galvanized a nation bent upon change. This is what President Obama has been doing as he charts a future course for our country with the same quiet dignity. This is why we see so much of, and hear so often from, our activist president. It is one reason liberal change agents love him, and conservative change blockers hate him. It is the quiet dignity of an African-American man which they fear, recognizing its ability to galvanize and organize a nation bent on changing the old boys’ club which has benefited heterosexual white men for so much a part of our nation’s history. No one begrudges the right of white heterosexual men to achieve whatever their talents allow them, so long as their doing so is not at the expense of, nor upon the backs of, the rest of the nation’s citizens. It has only become a class war because they used their accumulated wealth to create an upper class in control of  the generation of all wealth.

Facing decades of civil rights demands,this upper class has been breached by a few formerly excluded from the opportunity to join their ranks. Too few of these men and women are willing to rock the boat that keeps them afloat,unfortunately. To their amazement and even horror, one of those allowed in, President Barack Obama, was daring enough to take the oars and chart a new course for the ship of state the upper class had sailed for so many years.

This is why they block his efforts to rebuild America, to create a more a perfect union, to overcome old divisions which separate us not only by race,sex,and sexual preference, but by class. Their efforts to take back the oars failed in 2012 despite a constant stream of racial and class denigration of both President and First Lady Barack and Michelle Obama. The stronger their fear that they have lost control of the ship of state, the more willing they have become to sink the ship itself.

The latest Senate filibuster which prevented the Senate from voting out a bill to stop sequestration and offer the balanced bill proposed by President Obama to: close tax loopholes of the upper class,make targeted cuts which would do the least harm to personal and national economies,invest in job creation and infrastructure,improve and expand educational opportunities,strengthen our national defense efficiently,create green alternatives to an oil-based/war-ensuring future meant the House could not even consider the president’s proposals-could not even consider the new course correction for the ship of state to a safer and a more productive course. Instead, in ensuring sequestration was signed into law, they poked holes in the hull of the ship of state, forcing the country to bail water instead of sailing forward.

As if this is not enough. Rep. Eric Cantor(R-VA) made another shot across the bow yesterday,discussing the republican decision to battle for more cuts when the debt limit maxes out in early March, and government spending for this fiscal year expires at the end of March. His goal is to stop President Obama’s balanced approach and protect the upper class from any affront to the wealthy donors his party now protects at all costs to the detriment of nation as a whole. “I think it is possible that we would shut down the government to make sure President Obama understands that we’re serious,” explained Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, (R-Wash), the fourth ranking Republican in the House. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-34222_162-57563805-10391739/republicans-contemplating-government-shutdown-over-debt-fight/

The self-satisfied smirks of Eric Cantor, Mitch McConnell,John Boehner,and Cathy McMorris Rodgers match that of Justice Antonin Scalia whom I mentioned in an earlier post https://annarinowrites.wordpress.com/2013/02/28/basketball-and-voting-rightsby-louise-annarino2-28-2013/. In each case they smirk with gleeful expression when colleagues in the House and Senate and on the court, and governors from their states question their destructive lack of governmental integrity. I know that smirk. In children it is usally acompanied by finger wagging from the ears and the sing-song phrase “na,na…na,na,na.”  it is the behavior of bullies, bullies who would destroy the country so long as it destroyed its first African-American president and his challenge to the captains of the upper class. Who would sink the ship of state when it dared cross into the shipping lanes of the ocean liners and yachts of the upper class? No one with something to lose.

“Why?” we ask, are republicans so willing to ignore the will of the people,to ignore the polls showing the people’s opposition to republican governance and support for the president’s governance proposals ? Why are they sinking the ship of state? Because they are doing so from the presumed safety of the ocean liner’s deck. They have abandoned the ship of state and called a recess. They should recall the Titanic, a ship considered too big to fail. They should recall that ocean liners rely on tugboats to bring them safely into port. But, those on the ocean liners call the world their home now. No longer is America their only port. They no longer curry favor from American tug boats. And so long as they can stay afloat amassing even more wealth in international ports, they feel safe from those of us on land whom they view as inferior because of our race,color,national origin,sex,or sexual preference. These named classses are protected legal classes because they are the classes most under attack.

Persons within these legally-protected classes are most under attack becasue the upper class fears them the most, and has the power and funds to stage an attack against them. A republican has told me that my writing about race as a motivation for the attacks against the president and his positions is my fall-back  position. He is wrong. It is my frontal assault position. It may appear to some as a fall-back since I try to do it with grace and dignity. But we both know refusing to go to the back of the bus is not a fall-back position. And republicans repeatedly tell us that is where our president must sit.

It has ever been my world view that racism is the biggest threat to the  idea of America,and our biggest political threat. If this were not the case, politicians would not so readily use it to attack our president and undermine his leaderhip at home and abroad. Class domination is also a dangerous political tool. Anger at our president is not only based upon racial animus. It also based upon a view of him as threat to the upper class of mostly white men who have bought poltical parties lock,stock and barrel. 

So, what do we do? Lock hands and arms and sing “We Shall Overcome”? Yes, if that strengthens us to organize,speak out publicly in blogs and letters to the editor, speak privately with our neighbors and friends,register and educate voters,call our representatives/senators/governors,donate to causes and poltical efforts which reform the processes which allow the upper class to go to sea and distance themselves from our problems ashore. We must protect voter rights,redistrict gerrymandered states,stop environmental degradation,assure safe food and drugs,improve and cut costs of medical and dental care for every American,protect American workers and create more sustainable jobs paying a living wage,and strengthen and defend public schools. These are actions we can take on a local level. As President Obama said, “Rosa Parks tells us there’s always something we can do… She reminds us that this is how change happens — not mainly through the exploits of the famous and the powerful, but through the countless acts of often anonymous courage and kindness and fellow feeling and responsibility that continually, stubbornly, expand our conception of justice — our conception of what is possible.”

Republicans are currently more fearful than democrats of the power and wealth-making efforts sought by classes previously denied full particpation in the American dream. Their tent is not so diverse as the democratic tent,becasue their policies continue to poke holes in any boat which welcomes diverse passengers aboard ship. Justice Scalia recently explained their position to us: calling others aboard ship creates an expectation of racial entitlement. The more diverse the ship of state becomes, the more willing republicans are to watch it sink with all of us on board.The more willing a man who opposed activist judges his whole life is to become one himself,throwing his integrity overboard. We are not entitled it seems to stay afloat on their seas. So, by our activism, we must remind ourselves and them that “We Shall Overcome.” Let us “Lift Every Voice and Sing.”

Leave a comment

Filed under POLITICS

Basketball and Voting Rights,By Louise Annarino,2-28-2013

Basketball and Voting Rights,By Louise Annarino,2-28-2013

My dad’s high school basketball team won the all-state championship in high school. I don’t recall a time we were not shooting baskets, both indoors and outdoors.If one opened my parent’s bedroom door outward it fell across a corner of the dining room creating a “basket”. Despite the fact that errant balls and exhuberant blocks broke several of Mom’s Heisey pieces displayed on the buffet,she allowed us to to shoot hoops there every day,inevitably joining in to make a few baskets herself. We also shot hoops into the basket positioned over the door frame between the kitchen and my brothers’ bedroom,being careful to keep the ball from bouncing into the suga and meatballs simmering on the stove.

Outdoors we played on a small poured concrete patio, the basket affixed to the garage roof edge. When we removed the cement block four-bay garage alongside our house Dad installed a full court with hoops at each end where the entire neighborhood gathered to play. Mom added an additional rule to the NCAA rules we followed,“no cussing”, which resulted in a technical foul for both teams and ended the game for the day. Mom did not allow rule-breaking and discourtesy among us. She understood how quickly relationships deteriorate,and a game can be ruined when common civility and rules breakdown. She inserted herself as the referee. Did the neighborhood boys appreciate Mom’s interference? Surely not, if one is to judge by their griping and whining,bowed heads and limp waves good-bye as they were thrown off the court and out of the yard. But, if they wanted to play the game,she insisted it be played fairly. What would have happened had we a Mother less astute, and less available to jump in when unfairness and manipulation of rules reared their ugly heads as they inevitably do?

Justice Antonin Scalia may have had an Italian mother, but she did not teach him the manners and sense of fairness my mother taught her kids and the kids in my neighborhood. The 1965 Voting Rights Act sets up the rules of the game for fair and non-discriminatory elections. Section 5 puts in place someone like Mom, the U.S. Departmenet of Justice,to assure the rules are followed. When Mom sensed a player needed more supervision because of prior violations of her house rules,that player had to seek her approval before re-entering the yard. She would never end the game her own children had a right to play in their own yard. However,she would assure the game was fairly and decently played,and did not hesitate to close down the game to the neighborhood kids,when her kids were threatened.

The yard was our yard;the court,our court. Neighborhood kids did not have a “right” to play there without Mom’s permission and our invitation. Justice Antonin Scalia seems to apply this same outlook to a citizen’s “right” to vote. Like Mom, he recognizes the voting rights of his kids. But, he sees African-Americans and other minorities as merely neighborhood kids, rather than family members. During oral arguments,he referred to Congress’s renewal of the Voting Rights Act as the “perpetuation of racial entitlement,” ensuring rights above and beyond those others are entitled to enjoy. But, African-Americans and other minorities are not simply neighborhood kids. They are entitled to the same rights of citizenship as the rest of us. Guaranteeing their right to vote doe not grant a right to which they are otherwise not entitlted.

In those states which continue to practice racial discrimination,which  continue to restrict or deny equal access to the polls, or which continue to deny full and equal import of those votes, Section 5 of the 1965 Voting rights Act rightfully acts as referee and ensures the rules of racial equality enshrined in our Constitution must be followed. Section 5 does not stop the game,nor send anyone home depriving them of their right to vote.It simply assures the game is fair. When Congress,with unanimous Senate approval, extended the Act in 2006, it did so after consdiering 13,000 pages of documented instances of racial discrimination. “Consider the simplistic suggestion from the chief justice that because “the citizens in the South are [no] more racist than citizens in the North” we can safely ignore evidence that Southern states still systematically discriminate against minorities”(http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/02/voting-rights-act). Indeed, one could argue that Section 5 should be expanded to northern states such as Pennsylvania and Ohio. In Franklin County (Columbus),Ohio GOP Chair Doug Preisse gave a surprisingly blunt answer to the Columbus Dispatch : “I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process to accommodate the urban—read African-American—voter-turnout machine,”  adding, a la Justice Scalia, in an email to the Dispatch “let’s be fair and reasonable.”

Yes,let’s be fair and reasonable,to every player in the game. Justice Sonia Sotomayor fairly and reasonably pointed out to the attorney arguing on behalf of plaintiff Shelby County,Alabama who alleged racial discrimination was no longer evident in his county, “You may be the wrong party bringing this suit,”calling Shelby County the “epitome” of the reason for keeping Section 5 in place. She cited 240 discriminatory voting measures recently blocked by Section 5 and Section 2 challenges. She said she accepted that some portions of the South had changed, “but your county hasn’t.”(http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/12-96.pdf)

Yes,let’s be fair and reasonable. College basketball was integrated in 1947 when Coach Wooden played an African-American for Indiana University,violating the gentleman’s agreement barring African-Americans from the Big Ten Conference. In 1961, Loyola broke the gentleman’s agreement  not to play more than three African-American players when it played four at one time. Loyola also became the first team in NCAA history to play an all-Black lineup in 1962. In 1963 Loyola started four African-American playes in the NCAA Tournament and Championship game. The NIT and NCAA had integrated ten years earlier,relying on those gentleman’s agreements to limit and restrict African-American participation.It seems they agreed as gentleman to allow African-American participation,so long as such participation was miniscule.

Yes,let’s be fair and reasonable. in the 1949-50 season,following the merger of the Black Fives (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Fives)with white professional basketball leagues, led by the National Basketball League/NBL, they joined to form the National Basketbll Association/NBA. African-Americans were finally signed to play professional basketball on formerly all-white teams,but relegated solely to the roles of rebounding and defense. It wasn’t until the 1960‘s that Bill Russell and Wilt Chamberlain were the first African-American pros allowed to fully display their skills.http://en.wikipedia.org/wikiBlack_participation_in_college_basketball

Once we recognized the excellence and success of African-American players, rule-changes were inevitable to contain them. Gentleman’s agreements were no longer sufficient restraints.In the 1964-65 season lanes were widened from 12-16 feet to contain the great Wilt Chamberlain.(http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_history.html). Later,the dunk shot was prohibited,for similar reasons.  Equally inevitable once African-American Barack Obama was elected president of the United States, was the effort to change election rules to restrain the African-American vote. Republican Governors and Secretaries of State elected in 2010 off-year election expected to derail Obama’s re-election. However,his excellence and skills were sufficient to assure an incredulous (to Grover Norquist among others) second term despite the billions of  private donor and SUPERPAC dollars,political,and overtly racist attacks on the President and First Lady. A determined and strong response by the Justice Department using Section 5 of the Civil Rights Act, public sentiment fueling an ever-increasingly strong ground game, and the sheer determination of African-Americans to stand in voting lines for long hours to cast a vote no matter what shocked Shelby County and those who believe the election game is theirs alone.Efforts to treat African-American voters as merely neighborhood kids failed. Not every African-American is a Wilt Chamberlain nor Barack Obama;but,white reaction to full participation in basketball or politics would make one think so. Are we still so blinded by our racism? Yes.

Regardless of how the U.S. Supreme Court rules in the Shelby County,Alabama case it is clear we are entering a new era of civil rights activism, led by those too young to remember or to have participated in the marches, sit-ins and protest demonstrations of old. This case will reinvigorate the effort to organize,register and get to the polls all citizens who believe in a fair game, and a fair poltical process. Whether one is African-American, Asian,East-Asian,Latino,LGBT,or female the game is now much clearer. We must elect those at every level, city-county-state-federal, who will protect and defend the rights of all citizens. Unfortunately, we have to wait out the far-right conservatives on the Supreme Court blocking  until more fair and reasonable justices can be appointed; but, we can put in place a president who will appoint judges and justices willing to uphold equal rights for all, and a Congress eager to approve such appointments. Elections matter. It is time to organize now for 2014 when we can elect fair and reasonable candidates to the House and Senate, and to state and local offices. The Shelby County’s suit reminds us, as did Thomas Jefferson, that the “price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” Be vigilant and vote. That is how we protect our civil rights. No one can stop us from voting unless we allow it.

ADDENDUM:

It has been brought to my attention that it was grossly unfair of me to  speak of Mrs. Scalia, Justice Antonin Scalia’s mother, when she cannot defend herself. This is very true. I could have discussed the poor behavior of Justice Scalia with no mention of his Mother and should have done so. I fell into my own writer’s trap when I compared someone I do not know and have never met, whose opinions I have never heard, and who is not a public figure as a counterpoint to balance my own mother. I was completely wrong to have done so. I sincerely and abashedly apologize to Mrs. Scalia,her family,her illustrious son and my readers.

 

1 Comment

Filed under POLITICS