Buried Memories of Drought,by Louise Annarino,3-9-2013

Buried Memories of Drought,By Louise Annarino,3-9-2013

 

The fly rests on a stone chip

laid bare by melting snow

creating easements

of rivulets channeled

into multiple streams

by snowdrops scattered

across the garden bed,

dropped petals

become holding ponds

for the streams’ runoff.

 

Each giant step I take

across the border

of miniature boulders

leaves behind  bare lakes

which soon

will fill

with the mist of

early morning fog,

a final snow melt,

and spring rains.

 

There is no lack of water now,

no need for hoses,

water buckets,

sprinklers nor rain barrels

to bring life to my garden.

Melons and berries

and squash yet hold

faith in my planting

against the buried memory

of last year’s drought.

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY

Family Reunion,By Louise Annarino,3-9-2013

Family Reunion,Louise Annarino,March 9,2013

 

20,000 types of bees ?

Who knew

what I saw last summer,

the few types,

eight or nine,

flying

flower-to-flower

jaunts,

were merely cousins

from beyond my knowledge.

I will look harder

longer

with greater expectations

from now on.

Magnetic pull

from variety

increased diversity.

The mosaic

continues

with dollar plants

from Lowes.

Abbruzzis

or Abbruzzeses,

how many types of

us are there?

More spellings

than we can guess,

more stories to tell

than any one

can remember,

if we ever knew

what is in our DNA.

Like bees hovering

near the hive

we are most alive

when traveling far

to be near

the garden

where we reunite.

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY

Social Security Is Not The Problem,Hombres, By Louise Annarino,3-9-2013

Social Security is Not the Problem,Hombres, By Louise Annarino,MArch 9,2013

This week,I watch the machinations of Washington with a jaundiced eye and pained heart wondering how lunches and dinners between enemies can end in anything other than a poisoned outcome. The fix to social security is simple. Several pieces of legislation recently introduced in the House and Senate would extend its full solvency far beyond the needs of the “baby boomers” and long-lived seniors expected in our future. Yet, Republicans insist it is causing our deficit problems and must be cut, and retirement age delayed, to avoid any tax increase to the top 1% of this country.

This reminds me of the scene from an old western: outside the saloon a group of hombres with drawn guns shoot at the feet of the sheriff to make him dance, just for their sport. Cowards and bullies displaying their power and  control over the town’s population. These disreputable shooters were usually financed by the richest land-owner in the area. This iconic scene always makes my skin crawl. It makes me want to lift my skirts and run them down, shoving their faces into the ground.Are you with me?

Social Security has a $2.7 trillion dollar surplus. It has contributed $0 to the government deficit.It is not used to  calculate current debt.It can pay out every benefit owed for the next 20 years,after which most baby boomers will be dead. It is the most successful social program in our country’s,maybe the world’s,history. It has made poverty in old age rare (less than 10%). It is safer than anyone’s 401K, as the latest Wall Street bust just proved beyond a doubt. Young workers should applaud it,not fear it.

Democratic Senators Reid,Leahy,Boxer,Franken,Blumenthal,Whitehouse and Klobuchar have introduced a legislative fix. “Under their legislation, those with yearly incomes of $250,000 or more would pay the same 6.2 percent payroll tax already assessed on those who earn up to $113,700 a year. Applying the Social Security payroll tax on income above $250,000 would only affect the wealthiest 1.3 percent of Americans, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research. Social Security officials say that simple change would yield about 85 billion a year to keep the retirement program strong for at least another 50 years.” http://vtdigger.org/2013/03/07/sanders-reid-defazio-introduce-legislation-to-strengthen-social-security/. Senator Sanders and Representative DeFazio have introduced similar legislation to simply remove the cap on $250,000 payroll assessment.

This legislation would assure Social Security benefits continue unabated COLA  increases each year. Chained CPI is NOT a fix;it is merely a means to reduce future increases and decrease income levels for those who rely on Social Security as their sole source of income. As it now stands, the COLA increases are often absorbed by the increases in medicare deductions. Chained CPI would only make this travesty worse.

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Dead Leaves,Louise Annarino,3-4-2013

An empty car park

becomes the playground

of the last fall leaves,

wizened brown flakes

skittering and scraping

scud missiles

of hope

to the garden

hidden beneath

the asphalt,

now crumbling

from heaving and sighing

its icy skin

itching

for Spring.

Soil pushes up

weeds from beneath

the widening cracks

where shredded leaves

find their final rest

and restore hope.

 

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY

The Argument,Louise Annarino,3-4-2013

The Argument,Louise Annarino,3-4-2013

 

The final words are better

than the first.

They tie up ends

and lessen the thirst

for meaning hidden

within the verse

of charges filed

upon the curse

of a voice demanding

“listen to me!”

 

Finally

 

love enters unrehearsed

and stops the loss

that might have been

a different ending

for both sides

unbending

with no reason

nor rhyme

except our time

together.

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY

Playing With Austerity? by Louise Annarino,3-3-2013

Playing with Austerity? By Louise Annarino, 3-3-2013

 

In 1964 the Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) was created by Sargent Shriver and William Mullins to implement President Johnson’s War on Poverty  and lay the basis for his Great Society. Many of the programs initiated under the OEO continue underfunded and under constant attack within HHS.

 

In March,1968, Martin Luther King,Jr. was assassinated and African-Americans living in  segregated enclaves within large urban areas erupted in grief and anger. But not in Indianapolis where then-presidential candidate Senator Robert F. Kennedy spoke to the crowd gathered to hear a campaign speech. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCrx_u3825g

 

Senator Kennedy announced the assassination and then identified with the pain,grief and vengeful feelings likely to be felt, having experienced  the assassination of his own brother. He called for love,wisdom,compassion and justice for those who still suffer in our country. He acknowledged that most people Black and white “want to live together and improve the quality of life,and provide justice for all human beings who abide in our land.”

 

Shortly after the assassination, the OEO created a pilot project to establish summer recreation programs for children in poor urban neighborhoods.  The Salvation Army agreed to pay the $40 per week salary of recreation leaders for each of four anticipated programs in my small town. We four were 18 year old freshmen at OSU Newark. I was assigned to the near East-End African-American community, where the Reverend Charles Noble,Sr., pastor of the Shiloh Baptist Church had agreed to allow us to use a vacant lot across the street from the church. After weeks of meeting to figure out what we do and how we would do it with no firm plans in place I had had enough. It was already May and children would soon be out of school but we had nothing to show for all of our meetings but serious frustration. I announced I would not be attending the next meeting.Instead I could be found in my assigned neighborhood should I be needed.

 

I first introduced myself to Rev. Noble who could not have been more displeased to see a naive young white woman coming into the community with nothing to offer. I was equally dismayed at the lot I was to use. It was huge and covered with rocks,not gravel, interspersed with rusty cans,broken bottles, and gross detritus best unnamed. Next,I walked door-to-door introducing myself to the parents and aunties,asking what they wanted to see happen on the lot,and what type of program would be most helpful. The answer: a playground for the younger kids, a basketball court for the older boys and young men,horse shoe pits and picnic tables for the community-at-large. I had no budget.

 

I did have S&H green stamps earned at the local A&P. I called the number on the back of the folder where Mom pasted stamps to ask how many stamps would be needed to earn swings, a merry-go-round, teeter-totters,and monkey bars. They laughed but after a few minutes of discussion decided they could help and would provide those items if I delivered several thousand coupon books to the local A&P for redemption. When I asked my uncle how to make a horse shoe pit,sand boxes, and picnic tables he said “leave it to me. The guys at the missile plant can build them for you.” And they did. But, I needed sand. So, I called a Newark sand and gravel company agreed to supply the sand for the sand boxes and horse shoe pits if I could find a truck to pick it up. A Newark truck company agreed to do so. A Newark fence company agreed to install a chain link fence around the entire perimeter. The Newark asphalt company agreed to pour a basketball court and the Newark High School basketball coaches agreed to paint  the lines and install the hoops at regulation height.

 

The community collected every green stamp they could find and within a few days our playground equipment was on-order. Within three weeks,we had a fully functioning playground. Needing playground equipment:basketball,footballs,bats and balls,hula hoops,jump ropes etc. I played a game with two local stores. Sears agreed to match J.C. Penney’s donation of toys and raise the amount; Penneys agreed to match Sears and raise it. The Farm Store donated the shed to store all our equipment. Soon more than 200 children were regulars. Older sisters and brothers bringing little ones,even infants in strollers while their mothers worked. After the factories let out, the young men came by to shoot hoops.  When I invited the A&P manager to see what they had helped accomplishment I asked if he could help with a hunger issue I had noted. A&P provided cereal,milk and fruit each morning for every child,with hot dogs and chips on friday afternoons. My girl friends’ mothers rotated baking and delivery of cookies each afternoon.

 

The local gang provided security. We never had a theft,graffiti art,nor vandalism on our playground. The gang leader became our martial arts trainer, and at my insistence, learned the Queensberry rules to ref boxing matches we held using my dad’s old boxing gloves. Rev. Noble visited,his eyes narrowed, taking it all in, making a brief nod my direction before returning to the church. I let out my breath!

 

The Army,Navy,and Airforce recruiters provided drivers and buses for field trips.

 

A month after the playground was completed I was fired for failing to attend meetings and immediately reinstated once the OEO regional organizer finally paid the visit I had asked for weeks earlier. Mine was the only recreation program to be implemented in our town that summer.

 

Why am I writing about this today? Because the republican view of private enterprise, and the democratic view of government investments as engines for productive growth are both correct. There is a place for each. Without the OEO and its efforts there would have been no playground. Without the private donations there would have been no playground. Without the Salvation Army paying my salary,and Rev. Noble’s donation of land there would have been no playground. Without the volunteer efforts and donations from so many local businesses, there would have been no playground. It took all of us working together. It took INVESTMENT of time and money, public tax dollars and private funds. A balance of government and private investment built that playground.

 

What is NOT acceptable is an economic development viewpoint that austerity can build a new America. It can’t build a playground,nor a country! When President Obama talks about balance,calls for increased revenue and sensible cuts to programs which don’t work, he is absolutely right. to do so. Like me, he was once a community organizer.He knows how to get things done,how to get this country moving. He is doing so despite great odds. His Organizing For Action group is the embodiment of community organization. You can get involved by clicking https://my.barackobama.com/page/s/organizing-for-action.

 

Cutting taxes for the wealthy does not create growth. It merely creates more wealth for the already wealthy. Working men and women, built our playground. There were no wealthy donors standing in line to build a playground for poor kids. We need tax revenue to build a nation,a nation made up of local communities and neighborhoods like the east-end of Newark. We need government involvement to stimulate people and small businesses in those communities to help rebuild the infrastructure and programs which will “improve the quality of life,and provide justice for all human beings who abide in our land,” a goal that both Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King,Jr. sought to achieve. Austerity is the function of dying. If you have watched a love one die,you know exactly what I mean. I want America to live and grow.

Leave a comment

Filed under POLITICS

TUGBOATS,by Louise Annarino 3-2-2013

TUGBOATS

 

The flag is torn.

The ship of state slips its mooring.

The sea is rough

whipped by winds of change,

the journey

unplanned.

 

Anxiety breeds like flies

on the dying carcass of democracy

and greed

continues to fill

the slaughterhouse

of capitalist desire.

 

The overloaded burdens

turn the captain grey before his time

and shudder the rudder

gripped

by his hands on the wheel

as the great ship moves forward.

 

 

 

The bobbing tugboats

common,  small,

and defenseless are all

that stand between

success and failure

as they guide the ship to calmer, deeper seas.

 

It is the tugboats which protect democracy.

Not the sleek yachts.

Not the OIL tankers.

Not the cruise ships…

but the tugboats’ throaty whistles

and hardened hulls.

 

They work the harbors of the world

dressed down and

heads up

for sights and sounds of risk.

Then, set the path

to true freedom.

 

Only tugboats

can bring the ship of state, and us,

to safe harbor.

Those aboard the ship of state may wine and dine

the Great Pirates of the seven seas.

 

They would be wise

to recall

that the lowly tugboat

holds them

all

accountable.

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY

Lift Every Voice and Sing,by Louise Annarino,3-2-2013

Lift Every Voice and Sing,By Louise Annarino,3-02-2013

“Our minds fasten on that single moment on the bus — Mrs. Parks alone in that seat, clutching her purse, staring out a window, waiting to be arrested. That moment tells us something about how change happens, or doesn’t happen . . . We so often spend our lives as if in a fog, accepting injustice, rationalizing inequity, tolerating the intolerable. Like the bus driver, but also like the passengers on the bus, we see the way things are — children hungry in a land of plenty, entire neighborhoods ravaged by violence, families hobbled by job loss or illness — and we make excuses for inaction, and we say to ourselves, that’s not my responsibility, there’s nothing I can do. Rosa Parks tells us there’s always something we can do. She tells us that we all have responsibilities, to ourselves and to one another. She reminds us that this is how change happens — not mainly through the exploits of the famous and the powerful, but through the countless acts of often anonymous courage and kindness and fellow feeling and responsibility that continually, stubbornly, expand our conception of justice — our conception of what is possible.” – President Barack Obama,February 27,2013

On February 27,2013 in Statuary Hall at the nations Capitol,President Obama in the presence of the family of Ms. Rosa Parks, unveiled a full-body bronze statue memorializing that moment when she brought racism to its knees as she refused to stand, give up her seat to a white rider, and move to the back of a bus. It was not the first time someone had protested a move to the back of the bus, but it was the first time a nation came to her defense through the organizing efforts of the local NAACP chapter, and soon other civil rights organizations. While it is true a single act can change a nation, it can only do so when it galvanizes others to join in that change.

Rosa Parks’ quiet dignity galvanized a nation bent upon change. This is what President Obama has been doing as he charts a future course for our country with the same quiet dignity. This is why we see so much of, and hear so often from, our activist president. It is one reason liberal change agents love him, and conservative change blockers hate him. It is the quiet dignity of an African-American man which they fear, recognizing its ability to galvanize and organize a nation bent on changing the old boys’ club which has benefited heterosexual white men for so much a part of our nation’s history. No one begrudges the right of white heterosexual men to achieve whatever their talents allow them, so long as their doing so is not at the expense of, nor upon the backs of, the rest of the nation’s citizens. It has only become a class war because they used their accumulated wealth to create an upper class in control of  the generation of all wealth.

Facing decades of civil rights demands,this upper class has been breached by a few formerly excluded from the opportunity to join their ranks. Too few of these men and women are willing to rock the boat that keeps them afloat,unfortunately. To their amazement and even horror, one of those allowed in, President Barack Obama, was daring enough to take the oars and chart a new course for the ship of state the upper class had sailed for so many years.

This is why they block his efforts to rebuild America, to create a more a perfect union, to overcome old divisions which separate us not only by race,sex,and sexual preference, but by class. Their efforts to take back the oars failed in 2012 despite a constant stream of racial and class denigration of both President and First Lady Barack and Michelle Obama. The stronger their fear that they have lost control of the ship of state, the more willing they have become to sink the ship itself.

The latest Senate filibuster which prevented the Senate from voting out a bill to stop sequestration and offer the balanced bill proposed by President Obama to: close tax loopholes of the upper class,make targeted cuts which would do the least harm to personal and national economies,invest in job creation and infrastructure,improve and expand educational opportunities,strengthen our national defense efficiently,create green alternatives to an oil-based/war-ensuring future meant the House could not even consider the president’s proposals-could not even consider the new course correction for the ship of state to a safer and a more productive course. Instead, in ensuring sequestration was signed into law, they poked holes in the hull of the ship of state, forcing the country to bail water instead of sailing forward.

As if this is not enough. Rep. Eric Cantor(R-VA) made another shot across the bow yesterday,discussing the republican decision to battle for more cuts when the debt limit maxes out in early March, and government spending for this fiscal year expires at the end of March. His goal is to stop President Obama’s balanced approach and protect the upper class from any affront to the wealthy donors his party now protects at all costs to the detriment of nation as a whole. “I think it is possible that we would shut down the government to make sure President Obama understands that we’re serious,” explained Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, (R-Wash), the fourth ranking Republican in the House. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-34222_162-57563805-10391739/republicans-contemplating-government-shutdown-over-debt-fight/

The self-satisfied smirks of Eric Cantor, Mitch McConnell,John Boehner,and Cathy McMorris Rodgers match that of Justice Antonin Scalia whom I mentioned in an earlier post https://annarinowrites.wordpress.com/2013/02/28/basketball-and-voting-rightsby-louise-annarino2-28-2013/. In each case they smirk with gleeful expression when colleagues in the House and Senate and on the court, and governors from their states question their destructive lack of governmental integrity. I know that smirk. In children it is usally acompanied by finger wagging from the ears and the sing-song phrase “na,na…na,na,na.”  it is the behavior of bullies, bullies who would destroy the country so long as it destroyed its first African-American president and his challenge to the captains of the upper class. Who would sink the ship of state when it dared cross into the shipping lanes of the ocean liners and yachts of the upper class? No one with something to lose.

“Why?” we ask, are republicans so willing to ignore the will of the people,to ignore the polls showing the people’s opposition to republican governance and support for the president’s governance proposals ? Why are they sinking the ship of state? Because they are doing so from the presumed safety of the ocean liner’s deck. They have abandoned the ship of state and called a recess. They should recall the Titanic, a ship considered too big to fail. They should recall that ocean liners rely on tugboats to bring them safely into port. But, those on the ocean liners call the world their home now. No longer is America their only port. They no longer curry favor from American tug boats. And so long as they can stay afloat amassing even more wealth in international ports, they feel safe from those of us on land whom they view as inferior because of our race,color,national origin,sex,or sexual preference. These named classses are protected legal classes because they are the classes most under attack.

Persons within these legally-protected classes are most under attack becasue the upper class fears them the most, and has the power and funds to stage an attack against them. A republican has told me that my writing about race as a motivation for the attacks against the president and his positions is my fall-back  position. He is wrong. It is my frontal assault position. It may appear to some as a fall-back since I try to do it with grace and dignity. But we both know refusing to go to the back of the bus is not a fall-back position. And republicans repeatedly tell us that is where our president must sit.

It has ever been my world view that racism is the biggest threat to the  idea of America,and our biggest political threat. If this were not the case, politicians would not so readily use it to attack our president and undermine his leaderhip at home and abroad. Class domination is also a dangerous political tool. Anger at our president is not only based upon racial animus. It also based upon a view of him as threat to the upper class of mostly white men who have bought poltical parties lock,stock and barrel. 

So, what do we do? Lock hands and arms and sing “We Shall Overcome”? Yes, if that strengthens us to organize,speak out publicly in blogs and letters to the editor, speak privately with our neighbors and friends,register and educate voters,call our representatives/senators/governors,donate to causes and poltical efforts which reform the processes which allow the upper class to go to sea and distance themselves from our problems ashore. We must protect voter rights,redistrict gerrymandered states,stop environmental degradation,assure safe food and drugs,improve and cut costs of medical and dental care for every American,protect American workers and create more sustainable jobs paying a living wage,and strengthen and defend public schools. These are actions we can take on a local level. As President Obama said, “Rosa Parks tells us there’s always something we can do… She reminds us that this is how change happens — not mainly through the exploits of the famous and the powerful, but through the countless acts of often anonymous courage and kindness and fellow feeling and responsibility that continually, stubbornly, expand our conception of justice — our conception of what is possible.”

Republicans are currently more fearful than democrats of the power and wealth-making efforts sought by classes previously denied full particpation in the American dream. Their tent is not so diverse as the democratic tent,becasue their policies continue to poke holes in any boat which welcomes diverse passengers aboard ship. Justice Scalia recently explained their position to us: calling others aboard ship creates an expectation of racial entitlement. The more diverse the ship of state becomes, the more willing republicans are to watch it sink with all of us on board.The more willing a man who opposed activist judges his whole life is to become one himself,throwing his integrity overboard. We are not entitled it seems to stay afloat on their seas. So, by our activism, we must remind ourselves and them that “We Shall Overcome.” Let us “Lift Every Voice and Sing.”

Leave a comment

Filed under POLITICS

Basketball and Voting Rights,By Louise Annarino,2-28-2013

Basketball and Voting Rights,By Louise Annarino,2-28-2013

My dad’s high school basketball team won the all-state championship in high school. I don’t recall a time we were not shooting baskets, both indoors and outdoors.If one opened my parent’s bedroom door outward it fell across a corner of the dining room creating a “basket”. Despite the fact that errant balls and exhuberant blocks broke several of Mom’s Heisey pieces displayed on the buffet,she allowed us to to shoot hoops there every day,inevitably joining in to make a few baskets herself. We also shot hoops into the basket positioned over the door frame between the kitchen and my brothers’ bedroom,being careful to keep the ball from bouncing into the suga and meatballs simmering on the stove.

Outdoors we played on a small poured concrete patio, the basket affixed to the garage roof edge. When we removed the cement block four-bay garage alongside our house Dad installed a full court with hoops at each end where the entire neighborhood gathered to play. Mom added an additional rule to the NCAA rules we followed,“no cussing”, which resulted in a technical foul for both teams and ended the game for the day. Mom did not allow rule-breaking and discourtesy among us. She understood how quickly relationships deteriorate,and a game can be ruined when common civility and rules breakdown. She inserted herself as the referee. Did the neighborhood boys appreciate Mom’s interference? Surely not, if one is to judge by their griping and whining,bowed heads and limp waves good-bye as they were thrown off the court and out of the yard. But, if they wanted to play the game,she insisted it be played fairly. What would have happened had we a Mother less astute, and less available to jump in when unfairness and manipulation of rules reared their ugly heads as they inevitably do?

Justice Antonin Scalia may have had an Italian mother, but she did not teach him the manners and sense of fairness my mother taught her kids and the kids in my neighborhood. The 1965 Voting Rights Act sets up the rules of the game for fair and non-discriminatory elections. Section 5 puts in place someone like Mom, the U.S. Departmenet of Justice,to assure the rules are followed. When Mom sensed a player needed more supervision because of prior violations of her house rules,that player had to seek her approval before re-entering the yard. She would never end the game her own children had a right to play in their own yard. However,she would assure the game was fairly and decently played,and did not hesitate to close down the game to the neighborhood kids,when her kids were threatened.

The yard was our yard;the court,our court. Neighborhood kids did not have a “right” to play there without Mom’s permission and our invitation. Justice Antonin Scalia seems to apply this same outlook to a citizen’s “right” to vote. Like Mom, he recognizes the voting rights of his kids. But, he sees African-Americans and other minorities as merely neighborhood kids, rather than family members. During oral arguments,he referred to Congress’s renewal of the Voting Rights Act as the “perpetuation of racial entitlement,” ensuring rights above and beyond those others are entitled to enjoy. But, African-Americans and other minorities are not simply neighborhood kids. They are entitled to the same rights of citizenship as the rest of us. Guaranteeing their right to vote doe not grant a right to which they are otherwise not entitlted.

In those states which continue to practice racial discrimination,which  continue to restrict or deny equal access to the polls, or which continue to deny full and equal import of those votes, Section 5 of the 1965 Voting rights Act rightfully acts as referee and ensures the rules of racial equality enshrined in our Constitution must be followed. Section 5 does not stop the game,nor send anyone home depriving them of their right to vote.It simply assures the game is fair. When Congress,with unanimous Senate approval, extended the Act in 2006, it did so after consdiering 13,000 pages of documented instances of racial discrimination. “Consider the simplistic suggestion from the chief justice that because “the citizens in the South are [no] more racist than citizens in the North” we can safely ignore evidence that Southern states still systematically discriminate against minorities”(http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/02/voting-rights-act). Indeed, one could argue that Section 5 should be expanded to northern states such as Pennsylvania and Ohio. In Franklin County (Columbus),Ohio GOP Chair Doug Preisse gave a surprisingly blunt answer to the Columbus Dispatch : “I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process to accommodate the urban—read African-American—voter-turnout machine,”  adding, a la Justice Scalia, in an email to the Dispatch “let’s be fair and reasonable.”

Yes,let’s be fair and reasonable,to every player in the game. Justice Sonia Sotomayor fairly and reasonably pointed out to the attorney arguing on behalf of plaintiff Shelby County,Alabama who alleged racial discrimination was no longer evident in his county, “You may be the wrong party bringing this suit,”calling Shelby County the “epitome” of the reason for keeping Section 5 in place. She cited 240 discriminatory voting measures recently blocked by Section 5 and Section 2 challenges. She said she accepted that some portions of the South had changed, “but your county hasn’t.”(http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/12-96.pdf)

Yes,let’s be fair and reasonable. College basketball was integrated in 1947 when Coach Wooden played an African-American for Indiana University,violating the gentleman’s agreement barring African-Americans from the Big Ten Conference. In 1961, Loyola broke the gentleman’s agreement  not to play more than three African-American players when it played four at one time. Loyola also became the first team in NCAA history to play an all-Black lineup in 1962. In 1963 Loyola started four African-American playes in the NCAA Tournament and Championship game. The NIT and NCAA had integrated ten years earlier,relying on those gentleman’s agreements to limit and restrict African-American participation.It seems they agreed as gentleman to allow African-American participation,so long as such participation was miniscule.

Yes,let’s be fair and reasonable. in the 1949-50 season,following the merger of the Black Fives (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Fives)with white professional basketball leagues, led by the National Basketball League/NBL, they joined to form the National Basketbll Association/NBA. African-Americans were finally signed to play professional basketball on formerly all-white teams,but relegated solely to the roles of rebounding and defense. It wasn’t until the 1960‘s that Bill Russell and Wilt Chamberlain were the first African-American pros allowed to fully display their skills.http://en.wikipedia.org/wikiBlack_participation_in_college_basketball

Once we recognized the excellence and success of African-American players, rule-changes were inevitable to contain them. Gentleman’s agreements were no longer sufficient restraints.In the 1964-65 season lanes were widened from 12-16 feet to contain the great Wilt Chamberlain.(http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_history.html). Later,the dunk shot was prohibited,for similar reasons.  Equally inevitable once African-American Barack Obama was elected president of the United States, was the effort to change election rules to restrain the African-American vote. Republican Governors and Secretaries of State elected in 2010 off-year election expected to derail Obama’s re-election. However,his excellence and skills were sufficient to assure an incredulous (to Grover Norquist among others) second term despite the billions of  private donor and SUPERPAC dollars,political,and overtly racist attacks on the President and First Lady. A determined and strong response by the Justice Department using Section 5 of the Civil Rights Act, public sentiment fueling an ever-increasingly strong ground game, and the sheer determination of African-Americans to stand in voting lines for long hours to cast a vote no matter what shocked Shelby County and those who believe the election game is theirs alone.Efforts to treat African-American voters as merely neighborhood kids failed. Not every African-American is a Wilt Chamberlain nor Barack Obama;but,white reaction to full participation in basketball or politics would make one think so. Are we still so blinded by our racism? Yes.

Regardless of how the U.S. Supreme Court rules in the Shelby County,Alabama case it is clear we are entering a new era of civil rights activism, led by those too young to remember or to have participated in the marches, sit-ins and protest demonstrations of old. This case will reinvigorate the effort to organize,register and get to the polls all citizens who believe in a fair game, and a fair poltical process. Whether one is African-American, Asian,East-Asian,Latino,LGBT,or female the game is now much clearer. We must elect those at every level, city-county-state-federal, who will protect and defend the rights of all citizens. Unfortunately, we have to wait out the far-right conservatives on the Supreme Court blocking  until more fair and reasonable justices can be appointed; but, we can put in place a president who will appoint judges and justices willing to uphold equal rights for all, and a Congress eager to approve such appointments. Elections matter. It is time to organize now for 2014 when we can elect fair and reasonable candidates to the House and Senate, and to state and local offices. The Shelby County’s suit reminds us, as did Thomas Jefferson, that the “price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” Be vigilant and vote. That is how we protect our civil rights. No one can stop us from voting unless we allow it.

ADDENDUM:

It has been brought to my attention that it was grossly unfair of me to  speak of Mrs. Scalia, Justice Antonin Scalia’s mother, when she cannot defend herself. This is very true. I could have discussed the poor behavior of Justice Scalia with no mention of his Mother and should have done so. I fell into my own writer’s trap when I compared someone I do not know and have never met, whose opinions I have never heard, and who is not a public figure as a counterpoint to balance my own mother. I was completely wrong to have done so. I sincerely and abashedly apologize to Mrs. Scalia,her family,her illustrious son and my readers.

 

1 Comment

Filed under POLITICS

Sequestration,By Louise Annarino,2-26-2013

Sequestration,By Louise Annarino,2-26-2013

 

Universities are cities within themselves,with their own president and provost CEO,treasurer CFO,board of directors, and department heads of academic and administrative agencies. Their purpose is to serve the public by educating students,conducting research to advance economic productivity through discovery and innovation,and to engage in service to the university and world community.My first university job was as a resident assistant in co-ed hi-rise residence hall Lincoln Tower within the Department of Student Affairs,then as summer guide for parent orientation. While studying for a masters degree, Student Personnel in Higher Education awarded 1972 by The Ohio State University, I interned in the offices of admissions,financial aid,and Greek life. After a stint as a social worker at a maximum security prison for women,I became a resident counselor and moved to University of Cincinnati, joining three others as Resident Counselors of Sander Hall,overseeeing the student residence life,maintenace and housekeeping,and food service staffs. Sander, a 27 story coed hi-rise, was a small town within the U.C. community, housing 1300 students.During law school at U.C. I developed an off-campus housing office within the Housing Department. Following 5 years as a Legal Aid Attorney I returned to university work as Associate Director of Legal Affairs for Ohio University,Athens and Assistant Attorney General,State of Ohio. My university experience was invaluable in understanding the structure and governance of institutions dedicated to a public purpose. I love the cities called “university”. I love the core mission of teaching,research and servive. I especially love public universities such as those I served, whose focus is on the public good, and which use tax dollars to better the lives of our citizens, and strengthen our larger communities.

Across-the-board budget cuts are common occurrences within universities. Some handle budget cuts better than others. OU had a brilliant strategy allowing departments to keep any surpluses which they could accrue through efficiencies rather than returning  unused funds to the general fund at the end of the budget cycle. This encouraged savings and allowed departments to creatively use those saved monies as they saw fit. Such savings did not reduce the amount budgeted for the new cycle. They were not considered. In universities where unspent funds must be returned to  the general funds, departments notoriousy spend those funds on items of uncertain value rather than appear to have been granted more funds than they need,possibly resulting in cuts to later budget cycles. There is much more to sound fiscal budget management than numbers alone. The psychology of human nature must be taken into consideration as well.

During my time at Sander Hall one resident Counselor or RC left,not to be replaced. A second RC took maternity leave. A third was reassigned to replace the director of the alumni affairs office. I was left alone to perform the tasks of four RCs, part of a budget-cutting process. My staff of 28 undergraduate and graduate assistants offered to pick up RC tasks to assist me. I insisted they not do so. To have done so successfully would have undermined their own responsibilities to advise and counsel students,adversely affected their primary goal regarding their own educational experience, and belittled the positions of RCs making it likely there would be no budget increase for new personnel in the coming years. Instead we reconfigured the tasks to cover only those matters of essential or emergency nature. We had to let many tasks remain undone,those of least consequence to health and safety. Even so, a time study conducted by an independent company clocked my work week as requiring 96 hours of direct student conduct. This did not cover other duties related to managing the  residence hall, nor contact with staff. I was burned out; but neither my residence staff,maintenance and housekeeping staff, nor food service staff suffered burn-out. And the students’ needs were met. The only persons unhappy with the manner in which I handled the budget cuts were those responsible for the cuts.I refused all assignments for additional duties,did not have time to return their calls nor complete the reams of their required reports. I held fast to completing the core mission of teaching, counseling,housing and feeding students in a safe and secure environment. I left the following year,replaced by four RCs.

I imagine directors of programs facing sequestration cuts would appreciate flexibility in designing those cuts. I know I did. Regardless,our public employees who see their responsibilities increase while their salaries are frozen are now being asked to carry the burdens of a mission under attack by those who swore to support that mission when they took their oath of office as U.S.Senators or U.S.Representatives. Retirement figures for government employees are at an all-time high;the best and most experienced workers are leaving government employ.

One significant difference from the current sequestration cuts scheduled to occur March 1st. and those across-the board cuts of universities, is that university department heads had discretion to cut what and where they saw the best opportunity for saving without disturbing the core mission of the university. They were not required to cut every “activity” or “item” equally,or even at all. This allowed the mission to continue. Clearly, the Republican refusal to stop sequestration is not an effort to cut “fat” from government or even to reduce the cost of government; but, it is an effort to deride the core missions of the government. When they state that their purpose is to create smaller government  they mean reducing its mission. We all agree with President Obama that we can and must reduce the “fat” but Mitch McConnel and John Boehner want to kill the patient. This is why the Republican position is so repugnant. We are a government of the people,by the people and for the people. Self-destruction is not pretty.

Leave a comment

Filed under POLITICS