Tag Archives: race

MY FELLOW AMERICANS

MY FELLOW AMERICANS

I hold my tongue.

It takes strength I do not have.

Whimpers escape

On shattered breaths,

In silent screams.

The fight worries my soul,

Battle weary and choking,

On words held tight inside.

Once the scream begins

I doubt I could stop.

I wait for your speech.

I yearn for your promise

To stop the authoritarian

Who has taken over our house,

Emptied its vaults,

Stolen its wealth,

Sold its power

To the highest bidders.

So, I write. That I can do

While I wait for you.

To me, this nothing new.

Do you believe me now?

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY, POLITICS

WAKE UP THE YOUNG

Photo by Mark Angelo Sampan on Pexels.com

The older I get

the harder it becomes to

carry heavy hearts.

Young hearts are heavy

these days of heatwaves, flooding

and fires of war.

My own heart has slowed,

unable to speed or race,

beating a steady pace.

The young run shouting,

fueled by alcohol and fun,

circling around me.

I try to tell them,

straighten your path toward the goal,

a race to be won.

I shout from the sidelines

loss of freedom is gaining

on you, as you play.

Age carries no weight.

My words tossed away as trash,

as victory fades fast.

Woke becomes useless

for the young who sleep too late.

Please, now, come awake!

Leave a comment

Filed under POETRY, POLITICS

Lift Every Voice and Sing,by Louise Annarino,3-2-2013

Lift Every Voice and Sing,By Louise Annarino,3-02-2013

“Our minds fasten on that single moment on the bus — Mrs. Parks alone in that seat, clutching her purse, staring out a window, waiting to be arrested. That moment tells us something about how change happens, or doesn’t happen . . . We so often spend our lives as if in a fog, accepting injustice, rationalizing inequity, tolerating the intolerable. Like the bus driver, but also like the passengers on the bus, we see the way things are — children hungry in a land of plenty, entire neighborhoods ravaged by violence, families hobbled by job loss or illness — and we make excuses for inaction, and we say to ourselves, that’s not my responsibility, there’s nothing I can do. Rosa Parks tells us there’s always something we can do. She tells us that we all have responsibilities, to ourselves and to one another. She reminds us that this is how change happens — not mainly through the exploits of the famous and the powerful, but through the countless acts of often anonymous courage and kindness and fellow feeling and responsibility that continually, stubbornly, expand our conception of justice — our conception of what is possible.” – President Barack Obama,February 27,2013

On February 27,2013 in Statuary Hall at the nations Capitol,President Obama in the presence of the family of Ms. Rosa Parks, unveiled a full-body bronze statue memorializing that moment when she brought racism to its knees as she refused to stand, give up her seat to a white rider, and move to the back of a bus. It was not the first time someone had protested a move to the back of the bus, but it was the first time a nation came to her defense through the organizing efforts of the local NAACP chapter, and soon other civil rights organizations. While it is true a single act can change a nation, it can only do so when it galvanizes others to join in that change.

Rosa Parks’ quiet dignity galvanized a nation bent upon change. This is what President Obama has been doing as he charts a future course for our country with the same quiet dignity. This is why we see so much of, and hear so often from, our activist president. It is one reason liberal change agents love him, and conservative change blockers hate him. It is the quiet dignity of an African-American man which they fear, recognizing its ability to galvanize and organize a nation bent on changing the old boys’ club which has benefited heterosexual white men for so much a part of our nation’s history. No one begrudges the right of white heterosexual men to achieve whatever their talents allow them, so long as their doing so is not at the expense of, nor upon the backs of, the rest of the nation’s citizens. It has only become a class war because they used their accumulated wealth to create an upper class in control of  the generation of all wealth.

Facing decades of civil rights demands,this upper class has been breached by a few formerly excluded from the opportunity to join their ranks. Too few of these men and women are willing to rock the boat that keeps them afloat,unfortunately. To their amazement and even horror, one of those allowed in, President Barack Obama, was daring enough to take the oars and chart a new course for the ship of state the upper class had sailed for so many years.

This is why they block his efforts to rebuild America, to create a more a perfect union, to overcome old divisions which separate us not only by race,sex,and sexual preference, but by class. Their efforts to take back the oars failed in 2012 despite a constant stream of racial and class denigration of both President and First Lady Barack and Michelle Obama. The stronger their fear that they have lost control of the ship of state, the more willing they have become to sink the ship itself.

The latest Senate filibuster which prevented the Senate from voting out a bill to stop sequestration and offer the balanced bill proposed by President Obama to: close tax loopholes of the upper class,make targeted cuts which would do the least harm to personal and national economies,invest in job creation and infrastructure,improve and expand educational opportunities,strengthen our national defense efficiently,create green alternatives to an oil-based/war-ensuring future meant the House could not even consider the president’s proposals-could not even consider the new course correction for the ship of state to a safer and a more productive course. Instead, in ensuring sequestration was signed into law, they poked holes in the hull of the ship of state, forcing the country to bail water instead of sailing forward.

As if this is not enough. Rep. Eric Cantor(R-VA) made another shot across the bow yesterday,discussing the republican decision to battle for more cuts when the debt limit maxes out in early March, and government spending for this fiscal year expires at the end of March. His goal is to stop President Obama’s balanced approach and protect the upper class from any affront to the wealthy donors his party now protects at all costs to the detriment of nation as a whole. “I think it is possible that we would shut down the government to make sure President Obama understands that we’re serious,” explained Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, (R-Wash), the fourth ranking Republican in the House. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-34222_162-57563805-10391739/republicans-contemplating-government-shutdown-over-debt-fight/

The self-satisfied smirks of Eric Cantor, Mitch McConnell,John Boehner,and Cathy McMorris Rodgers match that of Justice Antonin Scalia whom I mentioned in an earlier post https://annarinowrites.wordpress.com/2013/02/28/basketball-and-voting-rightsby-louise-annarino2-28-2013/. In each case they smirk with gleeful expression when colleagues in the House and Senate and on the court, and governors from their states question their destructive lack of governmental integrity. I know that smirk. In children it is usally acompanied by finger wagging from the ears and the sing-song phrase “na,na…na,na,na.”  it is the behavior of bullies, bullies who would destroy the country so long as it destroyed its first African-American president and his challenge to the captains of the upper class. Who would sink the ship of state when it dared cross into the shipping lanes of the ocean liners and yachts of the upper class? No one with something to lose.

“Why?” we ask, are republicans so willing to ignore the will of the people,to ignore the polls showing the people’s opposition to republican governance and support for the president’s governance proposals ? Why are they sinking the ship of state? Because they are doing so from the presumed safety of the ocean liner’s deck. They have abandoned the ship of state and called a recess. They should recall the Titanic, a ship considered too big to fail. They should recall that ocean liners rely on tugboats to bring them safely into port. But, those on the ocean liners call the world their home now. No longer is America their only port. They no longer curry favor from American tug boats. And so long as they can stay afloat amassing even more wealth in international ports, they feel safe from those of us on land whom they view as inferior because of our race,color,national origin,sex,or sexual preference. These named classses are protected legal classes because they are the classes most under attack.

Persons within these legally-protected classes are most under attack becasue the upper class fears them the most, and has the power and funds to stage an attack against them. A republican has told me that my writing about race as a motivation for the attacks against the president and his positions is my fall-back  position. He is wrong. It is my frontal assault position. It may appear to some as a fall-back since I try to do it with grace and dignity. But we both know refusing to go to the back of the bus is not a fall-back position. And republicans repeatedly tell us that is where our president must sit.

It has ever been my world view that racism is the biggest threat to the  idea of America,and our biggest political threat. If this were not the case, politicians would not so readily use it to attack our president and undermine his leaderhip at home and abroad. Class domination is also a dangerous political tool. Anger at our president is not only based upon racial animus. It also based upon a view of him as threat to the upper class of mostly white men who have bought poltical parties lock,stock and barrel. 

So, what do we do? Lock hands and arms and sing “We Shall Overcome”? Yes, if that strengthens us to organize,speak out publicly in blogs and letters to the editor, speak privately with our neighbors and friends,register and educate voters,call our representatives/senators/governors,donate to causes and poltical efforts which reform the processes which allow the upper class to go to sea and distance themselves from our problems ashore. We must protect voter rights,redistrict gerrymandered states,stop environmental degradation,assure safe food and drugs,improve and cut costs of medical and dental care for every American,protect American workers and create more sustainable jobs paying a living wage,and strengthen and defend public schools. These are actions we can take on a local level. As President Obama said, “Rosa Parks tells us there’s always something we can do… She reminds us that this is how change happens — not mainly through the exploits of the famous and the powerful, but through the countless acts of often anonymous courage and kindness and fellow feeling and responsibility that continually, stubbornly, expand our conception of justice — our conception of what is possible.”

Republicans are currently more fearful than democrats of the power and wealth-making efforts sought by classes previously denied full particpation in the American dream. Their tent is not so diverse as the democratic tent,becasue their policies continue to poke holes in any boat which welcomes diverse passengers aboard ship. Justice Scalia recently explained their position to us: calling others aboard ship creates an expectation of racial entitlement. The more diverse the ship of state becomes, the more willing republicans are to watch it sink with all of us on board.The more willing a man who opposed activist judges his whole life is to become one himself,throwing his integrity overboard. We are not entitled it seems to stay afloat on their seas. So, by our activism, we must remind ourselves and them that “We Shall Overcome.” Let us “Lift Every Voice and Sing.”

Leave a comment

Filed under POLITICS

Basketball and Voting Rights,By Louise Annarino,2-28-2013

Basketball and Voting Rights,By Louise Annarino,2-28-2013

My dad’s high school basketball team won the all-state championship in high school. I don’t recall a time we were not shooting baskets, both indoors and outdoors.If one opened my parent’s bedroom door outward it fell across a corner of the dining room creating a “basket”. Despite the fact that errant balls and exhuberant blocks broke several of Mom’s Heisey pieces displayed on the buffet,she allowed us to to shoot hoops there every day,inevitably joining in to make a few baskets herself. We also shot hoops into the basket positioned over the door frame between the kitchen and my brothers’ bedroom,being careful to keep the ball from bouncing into the suga and meatballs simmering on the stove.

Outdoors we played on a small poured concrete patio, the basket affixed to the garage roof edge. When we removed the cement block four-bay garage alongside our house Dad installed a full court with hoops at each end where the entire neighborhood gathered to play. Mom added an additional rule to the NCAA rules we followed,“no cussing”, which resulted in a technical foul for both teams and ended the game for the day. Mom did not allow rule-breaking and discourtesy among us. She understood how quickly relationships deteriorate,and a game can be ruined when common civility and rules breakdown. She inserted herself as the referee. Did the neighborhood boys appreciate Mom’s interference? Surely not, if one is to judge by their griping and whining,bowed heads and limp waves good-bye as they were thrown off the court and out of the yard. But, if they wanted to play the game,she insisted it be played fairly. What would have happened had we a Mother less astute, and less available to jump in when unfairness and manipulation of rules reared their ugly heads as they inevitably do?

Justice Antonin Scalia may have had an Italian mother, but she did not teach him the manners and sense of fairness my mother taught her kids and the kids in my neighborhood. The 1965 Voting Rights Act sets up the rules of the game for fair and non-discriminatory elections. Section 5 puts in place someone like Mom, the U.S. Departmenet of Justice,to assure the rules are followed. When Mom sensed a player needed more supervision because of prior violations of her house rules,that player had to seek her approval before re-entering the yard. She would never end the game her own children had a right to play in their own yard. However,she would assure the game was fairly and decently played,and did not hesitate to close down the game to the neighborhood kids,when her kids were threatened.

The yard was our yard;the court,our court. Neighborhood kids did not have a “right” to play there without Mom’s permission and our invitation. Justice Antonin Scalia seems to apply this same outlook to a citizen’s “right” to vote. Like Mom, he recognizes the voting rights of his kids. But, he sees African-Americans and other minorities as merely neighborhood kids, rather than family members. During oral arguments,he referred to Congress’s renewal of the Voting Rights Act as the “perpetuation of racial entitlement,” ensuring rights above and beyond those others are entitled to enjoy. But, African-Americans and other minorities are not simply neighborhood kids. They are entitled to the same rights of citizenship as the rest of us. Guaranteeing their right to vote doe not grant a right to which they are otherwise not entitlted.

In those states which continue to practice racial discrimination,which  continue to restrict or deny equal access to the polls, or which continue to deny full and equal import of those votes, Section 5 of the 1965 Voting rights Act rightfully acts as referee and ensures the rules of racial equality enshrined in our Constitution must be followed. Section 5 does not stop the game,nor send anyone home depriving them of their right to vote.It simply assures the game is fair. When Congress,with unanimous Senate approval, extended the Act in 2006, it did so after consdiering 13,000 pages of documented instances of racial discrimination. “Consider the simplistic suggestion from the chief justice that because “the citizens in the South are [no] more racist than citizens in the North” we can safely ignore evidence that Southern states still systematically discriminate against minorities”(http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/02/voting-rights-act). Indeed, one could argue that Section 5 should be expanded to northern states such as Pennsylvania and Ohio. In Franklin County (Columbus),Ohio GOP Chair Doug Preisse gave a surprisingly blunt answer to the Columbus Dispatch : “I guess I really actually feel we shouldn’t contort the voting process to accommodate the urban—read African-American—voter-turnout machine,”  adding, a la Justice Scalia, in an email to the Dispatch “let’s be fair and reasonable.”

Yes,let’s be fair and reasonable,to every player in the game. Justice Sonia Sotomayor fairly and reasonably pointed out to the attorney arguing on behalf of plaintiff Shelby County,Alabama who alleged racial discrimination was no longer evident in his county, “You may be the wrong party bringing this suit,”calling Shelby County the “epitome” of the reason for keeping Section 5 in place. She cited 240 discriminatory voting measures recently blocked by Section 5 and Section 2 challenges. She said she accepted that some portions of the South had changed, “but your county hasn’t.”(http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/12-96.pdf)

Yes,let’s be fair and reasonable. College basketball was integrated in 1947 when Coach Wooden played an African-American for Indiana University,violating the gentleman’s agreement barring African-Americans from the Big Ten Conference. In 1961, Loyola broke the gentleman’s agreement  not to play more than three African-American players when it played four at one time. Loyola also became the first team in NCAA history to play an all-Black lineup in 1962. In 1963 Loyola started four African-American playes in the NCAA Tournament and Championship game. The NIT and NCAA had integrated ten years earlier,relying on those gentleman’s agreements to limit and restrict African-American participation.It seems they agreed as gentleman to allow African-American participation,so long as such participation was miniscule.

Yes,let’s be fair and reasonable. in the 1949-50 season,following the merger of the Black Fives (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Fives)with white professional basketball leagues, led by the National Basketball League/NBL, they joined to form the National Basketbll Association/NBA. African-Americans were finally signed to play professional basketball on formerly all-white teams,but relegated solely to the roles of rebounding and defense. It wasn’t until the 1960‘s that Bill Russell and Wilt Chamberlain were the first African-American pros allowed to fully display their skills.http://en.wikipedia.org/wikiBlack_participation_in_college_basketball

Once we recognized the excellence and success of African-American players, rule-changes were inevitable to contain them. Gentleman’s agreements were no longer sufficient restraints.In the 1964-65 season lanes were widened from 12-16 feet to contain the great Wilt Chamberlain.(http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_history.html). Later,the dunk shot was prohibited,for similar reasons.  Equally inevitable once African-American Barack Obama was elected president of the United States, was the effort to change election rules to restrain the African-American vote. Republican Governors and Secretaries of State elected in 2010 off-year election expected to derail Obama’s re-election. However,his excellence and skills were sufficient to assure an incredulous (to Grover Norquist among others) second term despite the billions of  private donor and SUPERPAC dollars,political,and overtly racist attacks on the President and First Lady. A determined and strong response by the Justice Department using Section 5 of the Civil Rights Act, public sentiment fueling an ever-increasingly strong ground game, and the sheer determination of African-Americans to stand in voting lines for long hours to cast a vote no matter what shocked Shelby County and those who believe the election game is theirs alone.Efforts to treat African-American voters as merely neighborhood kids failed. Not every African-American is a Wilt Chamberlain nor Barack Obama;but,white reaction to full participation in basketball or politics would make one think so. Are we still so blinded by our racism? Yes.

Regardless of how the U.S. Supreme Court rules in the Shelby County,Alabama case it is clear we are entering a new era of civil rights activism, led by those too young to remember or to have participated in the marches, sit-ins and protest demonstrations of old. This case will reinvigorate the effort to organize,register and get to the polls all citizens who believe in a fair game, and a fair poltical process. Whether one is African-American, Asian,East-Asian,Latino,LGBT,or female the game is now much clearer. We must elect those at every level, city-county-state-federal, who will protect and defend the rights of all citizens. Unfortunately, we have to wait out the far-right conservatives on the Supreme Court blocking  until more fair and reasonable justices can be appointed; but, we can put in place a president who will appoint judges and justices willing to uphold equal rights for all, and a Congress eager to approve such appointments. Elections matter. It is time to organize now for 2014 when we can elect fair and reasonable candidates to the House and Senate, and to state and local offices. The Shelby County’s suit reminds us, as did Thomas Jefferson, that the “price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” Be vigilant and vote. That is how we protect our civil rights. No one can stop us from voting unless we allow it.

ADDENDUM:

It has been brought to my attention that it was grossly unfair of me to  speak of Mrs. Scalia, Justice Antonin Scalia’s mother, when she cannot defend herself. This is very true. I could have discussed the poor behavior of Justice Scalia with no mention of his Mother and should have done so. I fell into my own writer’s trap when I compared someone I do not know and have never met, whose opinions I have never heard, and who is not a public figure as a counterpoint to balance my own mother. I was completely wrong to have done so. I sincerely and abashedly apologize to Mrs. Scalia,her family,her illustrious son and my readers.

 

1 Comment

Filed under POLITICS

A Nation of Cowardly Lions?, Louise Annarino,1-15-2013

A Nation of Cowardly Lions?,Louise Annarino,1-15-2013

 

For the last one-half hour I have played solitaire in an effort to stop myself from writing thsi post. My anger and disgust had built to a fever pitch as I listened to comments made by those who promulgate hate by building fear, in particular using racial fear to fuel anger  and division, blaming their fears on our president. Ann Coulter explains to us that we have a minorities/demographic problem;not a gun problem. I guess that explains how President Obama,is the real problem. Hannity was very appreciative of her racism,um I mean insight.

Rep.John Boehner (R-OH) says he may need to shut down government by blocking the vote to raise the debt limit and pay our bills for “(Republican)party management” purposes. Blaming the president for paying bills authorized by Congress is something new; and,meant to undermine our president. Mr. Boehner,here’s a reminder: Country first,then party second equals patriotism.Harming the nation to harm a president is unpatriotic at best.

And now,republicans are discussing impeachment if the president raises the debt ceiling,or regulates guns. HAve they ever threatened a Republican president for seeking such actions? No. They have been trying to find grounds,reasonable or not,to impeach Obama since his first inauguration. Why would we expect them to stop now?

The eagerness with which Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) vowed to do anything it takes to stop Obama’s acting like a king or monarch in expectation of executive action to put in place reasonable regulations on guns…the week-long litany of an upcoming civil war…the lies circulating on facebook and arriving in my email from otherwise reasonable persons arguing we must stop Obama from working with the United Nations to destroy our 2d Amendment and take away our guns and ammo…and equally inane (yes,stupid,baseless,racist and ridiculous in the extreme)conspiracy theories are causing me to loathe many of my fellow citizens. Almost, I would guess, as much as they have come to loathe me. And that is the danger here.

Racist fear mongering is not new. I get it. Political demagoguery is not new. I get it. Manipulating the ordinary citizen to keep power and amass wealth is not new. I get it. Dividing the 98% so the 2% can get away with anything is not new. I get it. What I don’t get is how silent the leaders of business,politics,religion,news media and average citizens have become;and,how unconcerned they seem to be. SIlence is not an option in the face of evildoing. And what these emails, speeches, commentaries and blatant lies are doing is evil. They are making us fear and hate each other, threaten the financial and political stability of the nation,and create an environment ripe for violence.

The hypocrisy of the NRA to blame vidoe games for gun violence;then,issue a video game for ages 4 and up to shoot up coffins stuns the conscience.The frothing-at-the-mouth NRA spokeman and supporter shouting down Piers Morgan for offering statistics on American versus world-wide gun deaths outrages common decency. Threatening to shoot the president if he regulates guns should make a Tennessee man a criminal, not a celebrity.

I must keep reminding myself that individuals who take these positions are a very small yet vocal minority,influenced and persuaded by a well-funded but even smaller group of news moguls,CEOs and great pirates,gun manufacturers and arms merchants. I expect such greedy power seekers to act this way. I don’t expect my compatriots to fall for such shenanigans, or seeing them, remain silent.

I can tolerate differences of opinion. I cannot tolerate lies and hate. I don’t expect everyone to understand the law as I do, having studied and practiced it. Nor do I expect them to know the full history and context for the passage of the 2d amendment. But if they don’t know what they are talking about, they should take the time to learn something before simply repeating the garbage they get in their inboxes across the internet via email and facebook etc. We are living in a cultural milieu which creates deranged persons who kill with insensitivity. Failure to change the milieu, to challenge those who oppose such change,and to support those who do is wrong. It cannot be justified by indifference,ignorance or racism. We cannot simply join in and not take responsibility for our actions.

We treat our returning soldiers,who lived among violence,see those around them be maimed or killed, and possibly kill others over a period of a few years, for PTSD,post traumatic stress disorder. Yet, we allow our children to live among violence from infancy and into adulthood, watch their family and friends be maimed or killed, and possibly kill others. What they experience is not PTSD because it never ends. It is OTSD ongoing traumatic stress disorder.

But we sit silently while Ann Coulter and others blame those children of our inner cities, many of whom are minorities, for our violence problem. No,Ms. Coulter, minorities are not the problem; we white people are the problem,we of white-flight,neighborhood gentrification and relocation,gated communities,dislike of paying progressively higher taxes on our higher incomes,refusal to approve school levies,off-shoring jobs. We have created OTSD; and, blaming it on an African-American president, undermining his ability to lead a nation of people whose color we fear…that is the problem! And it is your hypocrisy and lies which prevent us from solving our problem. If we must  be afraid of anything, we must be afraid of our own cowardice.

Leave a comment

Filed under POLITICS

WALKING WITH ANGELA: DAY 1

WALKING WITH ANGELA: DAY 1

Louise Annarino

March 9, 2012

 

We were walking home from Van’s market, just around the corner from our house. We had gone to buy a loaf of bread to make toast for breakfast, my older brother still asleep at home. The sun had not risen far this summer morning, the air still cool. I was only 4 years old, too young to run the errand on my own. Thus, I was skipping alongside my mother Angela, dodging the globs of shade cast by the sun trying to find its way through the dark leaves of the maple trees along our route. The contrast of the darkness and the light, ever moving, often capturing my dodging feet, raised a question which I posed to my mother, “Why are some people white and some people black?”.

 

Taking my hand in hers, Angela responded “God does not want us to be bored. If we all looked alike life would be very boring. He made some people tall, some short, some thin, some fat, some with red hair, some with blonde hair, blue-eyed and brown-eyed…and some white, some black. Aren’t you glad He did that?”

 

I nodded yes, “like a box of crayons, right?”

 

“What do you mean?” she asked. She wanted to be certain I understood.

 

“I have more fun coloring with a box of 64 crayons than the 8 crayon box,” I answered.

 

“Yes,” she smiled down at me, “Just like that!”.

 

And now, I understood the power and beauty of diversity; and the wisdom of a God who shared his many images within each of us.

 

Sean Hannity has been playing part of an early video of young Harvard law student who would one day become the 1st. African-American president of the United States, Barak Obama. Young student Obama was speaking as a class leader before his peers, of all colors. They had been gathering for months pleading for a more diverse faculty; a faculty lacking any African-American women, any Latino men or women. He spoke after one of 3 African-American male faculty members, took an unpaid leave in support of the students’ efforts. The students were grateful for his support.

 

Hannity’s clip simply shows young Obama’s comments commending Professor Bell as proof of President Obama’s divisive outlook and support of radicals. Hannity does not understand that diversity does not equal divisiveness; it equals inclusion. It is no more radical than liking more variety in one’s crayons.He has it exactly backwards. He does not know he should be dodging the dark side of the leaves; and, instead, dance in the light shining through the trees.

 

He should have taken a few walks with Angela.

Leave a comment

Filed under POLITICS